Search Results for "Rule 137"

1191 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1191 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Holds High Court Has Exclusive Jurisdiction Under Section 29A(4) of Arbitration Act for Extension of Time. The term 'Court' in Section 29A(4) is interpreted to mean the High Court, not the Civil Court, to ensure uniformity and avoid multiplicity of proceedings.

The case arose from a dispute between Jagdeep Chowgule (appellant) and Sheela Chowgule & Ors. (respondents) concerning the jurisdiction to entertain a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Cancellation of Advance Authorizations and Demand for Customs Duty in Sugar Export Cases. Non-compliance with export obligation due to government-imposed export ban constitutes force majeure, and demand for duty with interest cannot be sustained.

The judgment concerns four writ petitions filed by companies engaged in sugar trading and export, challenging the cancellation of advance authorizatio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes FIR in Property Fraud Case Due to Civil Nature of Dispute. Allegations of Cheating Under Section 420 IPC Found to Be Commercial Transactions with Pending Arbitration, Not Criminal Offences.

The petitioners, Jeremias D'Souza and Collette D'Souza, filed a criminal writ petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seek...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurer's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Under Section 163A MV Act — No Defence of Contributory Negligence Available in Structured Formula Claims. Insurer Liable to Pay Compensation Despite Alleged Negligence of Deceased as Section 163A is a No-Fault Liability Scheme.

The appeal arises out of a judgment and award dated 20.06.2013 in M.V.C.No.301/2011 passed by the Principal Senior Civil Judge & M.A.C.T., Puttur, D.K...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Civil Appeals Challenging High Court's Validation of Kamal Vihar Township Development Scheme. Core Legal Question is Whether Scheme Violates Constitution (73rd and 74th Amendments) and Statutory Provisions of M.P. (C.G.) Nagar Thatha Gram Nivesh Adhiniyam, 1973.

The Supreme Court heard a bunch of civil appeals arising from the decision of the Division Bench of the High Court of Chhattisgarh, which had upheld t...