Search Results for "Arbitration petition"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "Arbitration petition"

2714 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2714 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Condonation of Delay in Filing Arbitration Petition Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Delay of 25 Days Not Sufficiently Explained. The court held that the death of a key director and business standstill did not constitute sufficient cause for condoning the delay in filing a Section 34 petition.

19 Jul 2016

The appellant, Jayshri Ginning & Spinning (P) Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against the dismiss...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Foreign Award Execution Case Due to Property Location. Territorial jurisdiction for execution of foreign award under Section 48 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is determined by location of property to be attached, not by place of cause of action.

30 Jan 2012

The appellant, Wireless Developers Inc., a US company, obtained a foreign arbitral award against the respondent, Indiagames Ltd., an Indian company, f...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay hears multiple arbitration petitions filed by various petitioners against the same respondent. The petitions, bearing consecutive numbers, seek relief under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

23 Apr 2025

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Fresh Arbitration After Supreme Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award Without Deciding Merits — Observations in Setting Aside Award Do Not Constitute Res Judicata. The Court held that setting aside an arbitral award under Sections 34/37 does not adjudicate the merits, and parties are free to arbitrate afresh under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

11 Mar 2025

The applicant, Batliboi Environmental Engineering Ltd., had entered into a contract with Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (HPCL) for construction ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitrator's Order Terminating Proceedings Under Section 32(2)(c) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Arbitrator's Decision to Terminate Proceedings as Unnecessary and Impossible Upheld as Within Jurisdiction.

3 Jul 2023

The Arbitration Petition was filed by Sheil Properties Private Limited (Petitioner) under Section 14 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, ch...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Security Deposit Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's finding that the amount was a refundable security deposit and not a loan, rejecting challenge under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

23 Jul 2019

The petitioners, A. S. Patel Trust and its trustees, challenged an arbitral award dated 12 October 2018 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Concil...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Setting Aside District Court's Order That Had Set Aside Arbitral Award on Grounds Beyond Section 34 Scope. The Court Held That Reappreciation of Evidence Is Not Permissible Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and the District Court Exceeded Its Jurisdiction.

21 Nov 2019

The appellant, M/s. Scigen Biopharma Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an order d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Travel Agent Dispute — Upholds Award of Rs.74,92,859 with 18% Interest. Arbitrator's findings on breach of guarantee and liability under TAFI's Joint Fixed Deposit/Bank Guarantee Scheme were not patently illegal or against public policy under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

7 Jan 2013

The petitioners, Dharmesh S. Salian (sole proprietor of M/s. Y.S. International) and his wife Yogini Dharmesh Salian, challenged an arbitral award dat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Dispute Over Limitation — Contractor's Claims Not Barred by Limitation. Part Payments and Negotiations Constitute Acknowledgment of Debt Under Section 18 of Limitation Act, 1963, Extending Limitation Period.

8 Mar 2016

The dispute arose out of a renovation contract between Mahavir Prasad Jangid (appellant/contractor) and ECGC Limited (respondent). The appellant compl...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Fresh Tender for PMC Contract for Versova-Bandra Sea Link Project. Contract Expired by Efflux of Time and No Automatic Renewal Clause Existed, Hence MSRDC's Decision to Float Fresh Tender Upheld.

8 Feb 2023

The petitioner, Louis Beger SAS, a French company with its Asia office in Haryana, was appointed as Project Management Consultant (PMC) by the respond...

89 90 91 92 93

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)