Search Results for "trust dispute"

4096 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4096 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award in Investment Dispute. Court upholds award of damages for breach of investment agreement, finding no patent illegality or perversity in arbitrator's findings.

The case involves a challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to an arbitral award dated 15th June 2017. The petitioner...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Rejection of Withdrawal of Suit Under Section 50 of Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950 — Petitioner Failed to Show Sufficient Cause for Withdrawal of Suit Filed in Representative Capacity.

The petitioner, Prabhakar Waktuji Sapate, filed three writ petitions challenging an order dated 21.1.2016 passed by the learned Joint Charity Commissi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging CGIT Award Allowing Correction of Employee's Date of Birth. Delay of Eight Years in Filing Writ Petition and Failure to Produce Evidence Justified Tribunal's Order.

The case involves a challenge by the Board of Trustees of Port of Mumbai (Petitioner) against an award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Petition in Bombay High Court Seeks to Quash AICTE's Withdrawal of Approval for Engineering and Polytechnic Colleges on Grounds of Alleged Land Deficiency. The Institute Argues That the Withdrawal After Years of Unobjected Approvals Violates Principles of Natural Justice.

In these writ petitions, the petitioner, a public trust running an engineering college and a polytechnic, challenged the withdrawal of approval by AIC...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Accused in Cheating Case Due to Civil Nature of Dispute and Lack of Criminal Intent. Failure to Perform Contractual Obligation Does Not Attract Offences Under Sections 406, 420, 120B IPC Without Evidence of Dishonest Intention at Inception.

The judgment arises from a criminal application and writ petition filed by Mahendra Premji Gangar and Kalyanji Premji Gangar (applicants/petitioners),...