Search Results for "Partnership dispute"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "Partnership dispute"

1975 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1975 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Petition for Appointment of Sole Arbitrator in Software Distribution Dispute — Pre-Arbitration Amicable Resolution Clause Held Directory. Clause 17 of the Software Distribution Agreement dated 2nd April 2011 provides for arbitration; court appoints sole arbitrator despite non-compliance with 30-day discussion period.

5 Jun 2020

The petitioner, Quick Heal Technologies Limited, filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seek...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Bank and Employees in Loan Dispute — Dispute Held Purely Civil, No Prima Facie Case of Cheating or Criminal Breach of Trust. Allegations of Forgery and Use of Forged Documents Also Not Made Out, FIR Quashed Under Section 482 CrPC.

2 Aug 2022

The judgment arises from two writ petitions filed by ICICI Bank Ltd., its employees (Zarin Daruwala, Girish Nayak, Arati Ramakrishnan, Vipul Parmar, K...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Setting Aside District Court's Order That Had Set Aside Arbitral Award on Grounds Beyond Section 34 Scope. The Court Held That Reappreciation of Evidence Is Not Permissible Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and the District Court Exceeded Its Jurisdiction.

21 Nov 2019

The appellant, M/s. Scigen Biopharma Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an order d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals as Not Maintainable: Order on Territorial Jurisdiction Not Appealable Under Section 13 of Commercial Courts Act. The Court Holds That Orders Under Section 9-A CPC Are Not Enumerated in Order XLIII CPC or Section 37 Arbitration Act, Limiting Appeals in Commercial Disputes.

14 Sep 2017

The dispute arose out of two commercial suits filed before the Bombay High Court, where the plaintiffs claimed reliefs and the defendants raised preli...

High Court

Bombay High Court Delivers Oral Judgment in Commercial Appeal No. 38 of 2017: Appeal Against Single Judge’s Order Setting Aside Arbitral Award under MSMED Act. Issues of Limitation, Mis-joinder of Causes of Action, and Territorial Jurisdiction Raised in Challenge to Award for Interest on Delayed Payments.

31 Aug 2017

The appellant, M/s. Delton Electricals, a partnership firm and small scale industrial unit, filed Original Application No. 1 of 2005 before the Micro ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Against High Court Ruling That Canteen Workers of Subsidiary Are Not Employees of Air India — Corporate Veil Not Lifted in Absence of Fraud. Workmen of Statutory Canteen Run by Wholly-Owned Subsidiary Under Factories Act Not Deemed Employees of Holding Company When No Direct Control or Sham Arrangement Proven.

1 Aug 2026

Background: The litigation arose from an industrial dispute raised by workmen employed by Chef Air, a unit of Hotel Corporation of India (HCI), who op...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging IRDA's Rejection of Insurance Broker License Transfer. Transfer of Corporate Agency License Requires Prior Approval Under Insurance Act, 1938 and IRDA Regulations.

7 Mar 2011

The petitioners, including Wills India Insurance Brokers Pvt. Ltd. and others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India ch...

High Court

High Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator in Railway Contract Dispute Under Section 11 of Arbitration Act — Petitioner's Request Granted as Disputes Fall Within Arbitration Clause. The court held that the existence of an arbitration clause in the contract agreement dated 12.02.2010 and the failure of the respondents to appoint an arbitrator justified the appointment of a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

2 Jan 2019

The petitioner, M/s Shri. Narasimhaswami Constructions, a partnership firm, filed a Civil Miscellaneous Petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitratio...

High Court

High Court Allows Petition Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for Appointment of Sole Arbitrator in Railway Contract Dispute. Court Appoints Retired Judge as Arbitrator After Respondents Failed to Appoint Arbitrator Despite Invocation of Arbitration Clause.

2 Jan 2019

The petitioner, M/s Shri. Narasimhaswami Constructions, a partnership firm, entered into a contract agreement with the respondents, the South Western ...

High Court

High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Arbitration Petition Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Due to Lack of Counterclaim. The award was found patently illegal as it granted compensation to an investor who had not filed any claim or counterclaim, based on a misconception from conciliation proceedings.

17 Mar 2026

The dispute arose from a stockbroker's operational error in handling a Margin Trading Facility account for an investor, leading to the auction of shar...

88 89 90 91 92

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)