Search Results for "Land Use Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Land Use Act"

4741 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4741 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds State's Power to Prohibit Export of Sand Under MMDR Act - Gujarat Rules Restricting Inter-State Sand Movement Held Valid. The Court held that the prohibition on export of sand was a reasonable restriction under Article 304(b) of the Constitution, aimed at preventing illegal mining and conserving natural resources.

1 Mar 2019

The case involves appeals by the State of Gujarat against the Gujarat High Court's judgment striking down Rules that prohibited the export of ordinary...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Entire Rule 15 of MEPS Rules Applies to Probationary Employees Under Section 5(3) of MEPS Act — Non-Compliance of Sub-Rules (3) and (5) Does Not Ipso Facto Vitiate Termination if Sub-Rule (6) Is Satisfied. The court clarified that only sub-rule (6) of Rule 15 is relevant for termination during probation, and failure to comply with sub-rules (3) and (5) does not automatically invalidate termination if the Management has objectively assessed the employee's performance.

30 May 2023

This judgment arises from a reference made by a learned Single Judge to a Larger Bench of the Bombay High Court at Nagpur, concerning the interpretati...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Land Acquisition for CCP's Solid Waste Management Site Due to Non-Compliance with Environmental Rules. Land Acquisition Notifications Set Aside for Failure to Follow Objections Procedure and Mandatory Site Selection Criteria Under MSW Rules, 2000.

15 Jan 2010

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Acquisition Order Under MHADA Act Due to Non-Compliance and Delay. Land Acquisition Proposal Sanctioned in 2006 Set Aside as Authority Failed to Complete Acquisition Within Reasonable Period, Rendering the Order Unenforceable.

31 Aug 2021

The petitioners, H.I.M.S. Botawala Charities (a public charitable trust) and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of I...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Clarifies Deduction of Broken Period Interest for Banks Treating Securities as Stock-in-TradeDeduction Allowed as Revenue Expenditure for Banks Holding Securities as Stock-in-Trade

16 Oct 2024

The Supreme Court addressed the treatment of broken period interest for tax purposes. The issue centered on whether broken period interest could be de...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Disqualification of Village Panchayat Member for Being Servant of Agricultural Produce Market Committee. Agricultural Produce Market Committee Held to be a Local Authority Under Section 14(1)(i) of Bombay Village Panchayat Act, 1958, and Section 3(31) of General Clauses Act, 1897.

22 Jul 2011

The petitioner, Babasaheb Devram Sathe, was elected as a member of the Gram Panchayat, Jalgaon Budruk, in 2010 and also functioned as Sarpanch. The fi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Acquiring Body's Writ Petition Challenging Section 28-A Award as Not Maintainable Due to Alternative Remedy. Acquiring Body Cannot Seek Reference Under Section 28-A(3) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894, as It Is Not a 'Person Interested' and Is Barred by Section 50(2).

18 Sep 2024

The Bombay High Court dealt with three writ petitions filed by the Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development Corporation Limited, the acquiring body for ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Challenging Sanction and Cognizance in UAPA Case — No Infirmity Found in Sanction Order or Cognizance Order. Court upholds validity of suo-motu sanction under Section 45(2) of UAPA and cognizance order under Section 120B IPC read with UAPA and CLA Act.

20 Sep 2024

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Fuleshwar Gope challenging the judgment of the Jharkhand High Court which refused to quash the sanctio...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Challenging Sanction and Cognizance in UAPA Case — No Infirmity Found in Sanction Order or Cognizance Proceedings. The Court upheld the validity of the NIA's takeover of investigation and the sanction order under Section 45(2) UAPA, finding that the timeline for independent review is directory and the cognizance order was based on prima facie material.

20 Sep 2024

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Fuleshwar Gope challenging the judgment of the Jharkhand High Court which refused to quash the sanctio...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows CENVAT Credit on Mobile Towers and Prefabricated Buildings for Mobile Service Providers — Interprets 'Capital Goods' and 'Inputs' Under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Mobile towers and PFBs are essential for providing telecom services and qualify as capital goods or inputs under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.

22 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court of India adjudicated a batch of appeals concerning the eligibility of mobile service providers (MSPs) to claim CENVAT credit on exci...

88 89 90 91 92

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)