Search Results for "Finance Act 1956"

1265 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1265 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sanctions Scheme of Amalgamation of Transferor Companies with Transferee Company under Sections 391-394 of Companies Act, 1956. Court found scheme fair and reasonable, no objections from Regional Director or Official Liquidator, and no prejudice to shareholders or creditors.

The judgment concerns a Company Summons for Direction No. 337 of 2014 filed in the High Court of Judicature at Bombay under the Companies Act, 1956. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sanctions Scheme of Amalgamation of Multiple Transferor Companies with Pebble Bay Developers Private Limited under Sections 391-394 of the Companies Act, 1956. Court dispenses with meetings of shareholders and creditors due to written consent and no objections from authorities.

The judgment concerns a Company Summons for Direction No. 340 of 2014 filed in the High Court of Judicature at Bombay under the Companies Act, 1956. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Pronounces Judgment on Writ Petition Challenging Disqualification of Consortium's Financial Bid in Municipal Water Supply Tender; Court Examines Scope of Judicial Review Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

The petitioners, a consortium of three companies, challenged the decision of the Mira Bhayander Municipal Corporation's Standing Committee which disqu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal of Leave to Execute Consent Decree in Company Liquidation. Consent Decree Declared Void as Fraudulent Preference Under Section 446 of Companies Act, 1956.

The appeal arose from an order of the Company Judge refusing leave under Section 446 of the Companies Act, 1956 to the appellant, Forbes & Company Lim...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Wagon Supply Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's finding that appellant failed to prove force majeure and that respondent was entitled to refund of advance payment with interest.

The appellant, Titagarh Wagons Limited, entered into a purchase order dated 20.02.2006 with the respondent, Chowgule and Company Private Limited, for ...