Search Results for "1982"

3276 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3276 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Challenging Preventive Detention — Personal Dispute Not Ground for Breach of Public Order. Detention Order Under Act 14 of 1982 Quashed as Adverse Case Was Under Investigation and Personal Dispute Existed.

The petitioner, Usharani, mother of the detenu Madhavan, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition, Quashes Preventive Detention Order in NDPS Case Due to Non-Commercial Quantity of Kanja. Recovery of 2.5 kg Kanja Not Sufficient Ground for Preventive Detention Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982; Ordinary Criminal Law Adequate.

The petitioner, Rita, mother of the detenu Lasar Merwin Vijay @ Merwin Vijay, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Closes Habeas Corpus Petition After Detention Order Revoked by Competent Authority. The Court held that no adjudication is required when the detention order under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 is revoked.

The petitioner, Krishnaveni, mother of the detenu Vasanth @ Bablu, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India befor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Closes Habeas Corpus Petition After Detention Order Revoked by Competent Authority — No Further Adjudication Required. The court held that when the detention order under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 is revoked, the petition becomes infructuous.

The petitioner, Chithra, mother of the detenu Rohith, filed a Habeas Corpus petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition, Quashes Preventive Detention Order Due to Lack of Public Disorder and Proximity. Detenu Ordered to be Released as Ground Case Under Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act Could Be Dealt Under Ordinary Law, Not Requiring Preventive Detention Under Act 14 of 1982.

The petitioner, Valliyamma, wife of Thirumalai alias Karuvadu, filed a habeas corpus petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Quashing Detention Order Due to Unexplained Delay. Unexplained delay of 51 days between arrest and detention order under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 snaps live link, rendering detention invalid.

The petitioner, Thiru Masthan, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the detention order dated 02....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition and Quashes Preventive Detention Order Based on Solitary Ground Case. Preventive detention under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 held unsustainable as ordinary criminal law is sufficient to deal with the case.

The petitioner, Angayi Kanakarathinam, mother of the detenu Ranganathan alias Rangarajan, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Cons...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition, Quashes Detention Order Due to Inordinate Delay Between Arrest and Detention. Delay of 37 Days Snaps Live and Proximate Link Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982, Rendering Detention Order Invalid.

The petitioner, Alminha, wife of the detenu Mohammed Masthan, filed a Habeas Corpus petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challengin...