Search Results for "vitiates order"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...

Search Results for "vitiates order"

770 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 770 result(s)

High Court

Deemed Conveyance under MOFA Cannot Be Set Aside Merely on Technical Objections When Developer Fails to Execute Conveyance – Bombay High Court

24 Feb 2026

The dispute arose when a cooperative housing society sought deemed conveyance of the land and building from the developer who had failed to execute th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Tahsildar's Order Cancelling Mutation Entries in Tenancy Land Dispute — Exceeds Jurisdiction Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. Tahsildar Cannot Cancel Certificate Issued Under Section 38(E) of Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1950, as Such Power Lies Only with Revenue Tribunal or Civil Court.

16 Oct 2025

The petitioners, legal heirs of tenants Ganpati Kundlik Kurule and Abaji Ramji Jadhav, challenged the order dated 04.09.2025 passed by the Tahsildar, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Tahsildar's Order Cancelling Mutation Entries in Tenancy Land Dispute — Held That Tahsildar Lacks Jurisdiction to Cancel Certificate Issued Under Section 38(E) of Hyderabad Tenancy Act After 65 Years Without Notice to Affected Parties. The court held that the certificate under Section 38(E) of the Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1950 attains finality and cannot be cancelled by the Tahsildar after such a long lapse of time, and the order was passed in violation of natural justice.

16 Oct 2025

The petitioners, legal heirs of original tenants Ganpati Kundlik Kurule and Abaji Ramji Jadhav, challenged the order dated 04.09.2025 passed by the Ta...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Husband's Revision Against Family Court's Refusal to Cancel Maintenance. Family Court's Order Upheld as Husband Failed to Prove Fraud or Change in Circumstances Under Section 127 CrPC.

18 Aug 2022

The petitioner/husband, Prakash Eknath Dheple, filed a criminal revision application under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 197...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition, Quashes MPDA Detention Order Due to Unexplained Delay. The court held that the live link between the detenu's alleged prejudicial activity and the preventive detention order was broken due to an unexplained delay of four months from the date of arrest and three months from the grant of bail.

15 Jun 2022

The petitioner, Shivkumar Madeshwaran Devendra, brother-in-law of the detenu Manoj Tangraj Devendra, filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Failure to Consider Bail Conditions and Inadequate Material to Show Disturbance of Public Order. The court held that preventive detention requires a threat to public order, not mere law and order issues, and that unexplained delay vitiates the order.

29 Jun 2021

The petitioner, Ganesh alias Gajaraj Sainath Patil, challenged a detention order dated 19 January 2021 passed by the Collector and District Magistrate...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Decree Holder's Execution Petition and Dismisses Judgment Debtor's Challenge in Property Execution Dispute — Court Holds That Execution Proceedings Are Not Barred by Limitation When Decree Is Put into Execution Within 12 Years of Final Decree Under Article 136 of Limitation Act, 1963.

28 Mar 2019

The case involves two writ petitions arising out of execution proceedings. The decree holder, Dr. (Smt.) Jayashree Avinash Banait, obtained a decree a...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Detention Order in Karnataka Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act Case — Failure to Consider Less Restrictive Measures. Detenu's brother successfully challenged preventive detention as the detaining authority did not consider the possibility of resorting to less drastic remedies under the Karnataka Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Drug-Offenders, Gamblers, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders and Slum-Grabbers Act, 1985.

26 Sep 2018

The petitioner, Suresh B. Shetty, filed a habeas corpus petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the preventive de...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Suspended Teacher Seeking Retirement Benefits and Quashes Suspension Order as Invalid Due to Non-Compliance with Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977. Suspension Order Issued Without Prior Approval of Education Officer is Invalid and Teacher Entitled to All Retirement Benefits from Date of Superannuation.

26 Jun 2018

The petitioner, Yadavendra Chitbahal Yadav, was an Assistant Teacher employed by Shree Saraswati Shikshan Prasarak Sanstha. He was suspended by an ord...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Application of Mind — Detaining Authority Failed to Consider Grant of Bail in Similar Cases. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Subjective Satisfaction Was Not Based on Relevant Material Under Section 3 of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981.

28 Mar 2018

The petitioner, Rohit Kesrinath Patil @ Dappu, challenged a detention order dated 6th January 2018 issued under Section 3 of the Maharashtra Preventio...

7 8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)