Search Results for "umadevi"

306 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 306 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Maternity Leave for Third Child Under G.O.Ms.No.84 — Fundamental Rule 101(A) Not Applicable. Court holds that beneficial government order providing 365 days maternity leave does not restrict to first two children, overriding Fundamental Rule 101(A).

The petitioner, S.Divya, is an Office Assistant serving in the Court of Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court Magisterial Level, Poonamallee. She has ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Hears State Appeal Against Regularisation Order in Government Technical Institute. State Challenges Direction for Regularisation from Date of Initial Appointment of Employees Not Sponsored Through Employment Exchange.

The State of Tamil Nadu, through its Education Department and other officials, filed a writ appeal challenging the order of the single judge dated 27....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Examines Legality of Termination of Backdoor Appointments in Nagpur Municipal Corporation. Court Considers Earlier Inquiry Report Finding Bogus Selections and Directs Action Against Irregular Appointments.

This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by twelve former employees of the Nagpur Municipal Corporation, whose serv...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Status of Voluntary Health Workers as Workmen Entitled to Permanency. Municipal Corporation's Scheme of Voluntary Health Workers does not create a master-servant relationship, but workers are entitled to permanency under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

This group of petitions concerns Voluntary Health Workers appointed by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, particularly in relation to their ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Council's Petitions Against Labour Court Awards in Retrenchment Compensation Cases. Held that Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 does not require a separate notice of retrenchment when the employee is already aware of the closure of the establishment.

The judgment involves a batch of writ petitions filed by the Municipal Council, Tirora, and its President against common orders passed by the Labour C...