Search Results for "tariff classification"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Attachment of Property in NSEL Scam C...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute — Bulk Pet F...

Search Results for "tariff classification"

117 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 117 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Customs Department's Reference Application in Export Valuation Case. Tribunal's finding that facts were indistinguishable from precedent upheld, no question of law arises.

12 Dec 2025

The Principal Commissioner of Customs filed a Civil Petition under Section 130A of the Customs Act, 1962, challenging the final order of the Central E...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Classification of Nescafe Premix as Coffee Under Entry 3 of Schedule C Part II of Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959. Product 'Coffee and Instant Drinks Nescafe Premix' Held Not Covered by Entry 18(2) (Beverages) Based on Common Parlance Test and Predominant Ingredient.

27 Nov 2025

The case involves a reference under Section 61 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, arising from a dispute between the Commissioner of Sales Tax, Mahara...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Refers Conflict Between High Courts on Settlement Commission Jurisdiction Under Customs Act — Personal Liberty and Right to Settle Disputes Under Chapter XIVA of Customs Act, 1962. The Court directed the matter to be placed before the Chief Justice of India due to divergence of opinion between Bombay and Delhi High Courts on whether an accused can approach the Settlement Commission after arrest.

4 May 2023

The present writ petition was filed by Yamal Manojbhai, a Non-Resident Indian (NRI), under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, raising an issue o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Appeal Under Section 35G of Central Excise Act Maintainable on Limitation Issue Even When Valuation/Rate of Duty Not Disputed. The Court ruled that the question of limitation is a distinct legal issue not relating to assessment, valuation, or rate of duty, and thus appeals challenging only the time-bar aspect are maintainable before the High Court under Section 35G.

23 Dec 2021

The case arose from a Central Excise Appeal filed by the Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Belapur, against Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Central Excise Classification Dispute — Interest Not Payable Without Specific Provision. Held that Section 11AA of Central Excise Act, 1944 does not apply to Additional Duties under ADE (T&TA) Act, 1978, and interest cannot be levied in absence of charging provision.

17 Jul 2017

The appellant, Indo Swiss Embroidery Industries Limited, is engaged in manufacturing embroidered grey fabrics classified under Chapter Sub Heading 580...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Revisional Jurisdiction and Denies Exemption for Brass Sheets Not Specified in Eligibility Certificate under Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959. The court held that revisional power under Section 57 can be exercised despite pending appeals, and exemption benefits require strict compliance with the eligibility certificate's specified goods.

26 Feb 2015

The case involves a reference under Section 61 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, arising from a dispute between M/s. Jitendra R. Gandhi (the assessee...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeals as Not Maintainable in Service Tax Refund Case. The issue of refund under notifications granting exemption for services consumed in SEZ relates to rate of duty, thus appeal lies to Supreme Court under Section 35G(1) of Central Excise Act, 1944.

23 Feb 2015

The case involves a batch of appeals filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, Pune (Revenue) against an order dated 28th March 2013 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Validity of Second Proviso to Central Excise Exemption Notification. The court held that the procedural condition requiring a certificate from the Assistant Collector for claiming exemption on export goods is valid and intra vires the Central Excise Act, 1944.

21 Sep 2010

The petitioners, Geldhof Auto and Gas Industries Ltd. and Shri Vaibhav Sanghi, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India ch...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Excise Duty Paid on Exported Goods Under Mistake of Law — Rule 13 Export Bond Not Used. Duty Paid Under Mistake of Law is Recoverable and Limitation Under Section 11B Central Excise Act Does Not Apply to Mistake of Law Claims.

24 Apr 2006

The petitioners, Tata SSL Ltd. and its director, exported consignments of Cold Rolled Sheets and Coils to Nepal by road. The goods were cleared from t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Central Excise Classification Dispute — M/s. Tien Yuan India Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise. Classification of plastic components under Chapter 39 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 upheld over Chapter 84.

30 Nov -0001

The appellant, M/s. Tien Yuan India Pvt. Ltd., was engaged in the manufacture of plastic components used in textile machinery. The Commissioner of Cen...

7 8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)