Writ Petition No. 2353 of 2013: Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to Notices Issued Under Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 Amidst Ownership Dispute
14 Jul 2016...
Search Results for "suit register"
1664 result(s) found
Found 1664 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Regular First Appeals Against Decree for Specific Performance — Trial Court Decree Granting Specific Performance and Cancellation of Sale Deed Under Challenge. The Court Reserved Judgment; Outcome Not Stated in This Excerpt.
22 Jan 2024These two regular first appeals arose from the judgment and decree dated 30.06.2015 in O.S.No.594/2005 passed by the XI Addl. City Civil Judge, Bengal...
- 32
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Preliminary Issue on Jurisdiction Over Originating Summons in Lease Dispute Where Defendant Has Filed Separate Eviction Suit. The Court Examines Whether the Filing of a Suit Under Section 41 of the Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882, After the Originating Summons Ousts the High Court's Jurisdiction.
29 Apr 2014This case involved a dispute between Century Textiles and Industries Ltd. (plaintiff) and Nusli Neville Wadia (defendant) arising out of a 999-year le...
- 20
High Court
Madras High Court Hears Second Appeal Against Concurrent Findings Dismissing Injunction Suit Based on Compromise Decree. Substantial Questions on Res Judicata and Minor Guardian Not Signing Compromise Raised.
28 Jul 2026The case involved a second appeal before the High Court of Madras arising out of a suit for permanent injunction filed by the plaintiffs-appellants ag...
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Injunction in Favor of Plaintiff in Trademark Infringement Suit Over STIMULIV vs STIMULET. Marks Held Deceptively Similar Despite Differences in Pharmaceutical Formulation and Therapeutic Use.
1 Mar 2021The dispute involves two pharmaceutical companies: Franco Indian Pharmaceuticals Pvt Ltd (Plaintiff) and Corona Remedies Pvt Ltd (Defendant). The Plai...
- 63
High Court
Madras High Court Considers Plaintiff’s Suit for Declaration of Title and Compensation for Land Acquired for Chennai Metro Rail. Suit Filed Under CPC Order VII Rule 1 and Madras High Court Original Side Rules Seeks Compensation for Grama Natham Land in Saligramam Village.
2 Feb 2025The plaintiff, D. Shankar, instituted Civil Suit No. 725 of 2018 before the Madras High Court seeking a declaration of ownership over three parcels of...
- 50
High Court
SECOND APPEAL NO. 148 OF 2016
21 Dec 2016The dispute centered on rights to perform pooja and collect offerings at Goddess Shree Rupa Bhavani Temple in Solapur, registered as a public trust. T...
- 24
High Court
Madras High Court Dismisses Contempt Petitions Against Judgment Debtor and Sub Registrars for Alleged Willful Disobedience of Prohibitory Order and Communication Order in Execution Proceedings. Court Held That the Prohibitory Order Under Order 21 Rule 54 CPC Was Not Served on the Judgment Debtor and the Communication Order Was Not a Mandatory Direction, Thus No Willful Disobedience Established.
11 Feb 2026The petitioner, A. Dakshnamoorthy, as power agent of his son D. Chandrasekaran, filed two contempt petitions. The first (Cont.P.No.1723/2025) was agai...
- 110
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Appeals Against Admission of Winding Up Petition in Shareholder Deadlock Case. The core issue concerns whether a petitioner who is not the registered shareholder can maintain a winding up petition after the registered shareholder merged into it.
20 Feb 2006The dispute concerned the winding up of Capital Controls India Private Limited, a joint venture between Chloro Controls (India) Private Limited and Se...
- 21
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Execution Decree Holder to Seek Possession Against Third Party Resisters Under Order XXI Rule 97 CPC. The Court held that executing court can decide objections of third parties claiming independent title without requiring a separate suit, and amendment of execution petition is permissible to avoid multiplicity.
18 Dec 2020The case arises from a specific performance decree obtained by Ayyavoo Udayar (predecessor of appellants) against vendors (respondent nos. 3 and 4) fo...
- 535
