Search Results for "subsistence allowance"

238 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 238 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Disciplinary Order for Recovery of Rs. 2398.80 Due to Violation of Natural Justice and Disciplinary Rules

The petitioner, a junior engineer with  Respondent, challenged a disciplinary order dated 14/05/2019 imposing recovery of Rs. 2398.80 for alleged...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Part in Service Matter - Backwages Denied but Liberty to Hold Fresh Enquiry Upheld. Petitioner's termination set aside due to procedural irregularities, but denial of backwages and liberty to conduct fresh enquiry were challenged.

The petitioner, Subrat Kumar Sahoo, was employed as a Librarian at Thakur College of Science and Commerce, managed by Thakur Educational Trust. He was...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Allows Union of India's Writ Petition Challenging CAT Order to Pay Full Salary During Suspension Period — Suspension Allowance Already Paid, No Entitlement to Full Salary Without Work.

The petitioners, Union of India and the General Manager, Ordnance Factory, Varangaon, challenged the judgment and order dated 09.03.2005 passed by the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Teacher's Petition Challenging Fresh Enquiry Order in Termination Case. School Tribunal's Direction for Fresh Enquiry Under Rule 36(2) of M.E.P.S. Rules Upheld as Within Its Discretion.

The petitioner, Abdul Salam Abdul Khalique, a junior college teacher, was terminated from service by the management of Shah Babu Education Society on ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Cross Appeals in Service Dispute Over Suspension and Terminal Benefits of Deceased Employee. The court held that salary during suspension is not payable if departmental enquiry is not completed, but provident fund and gratuity are statutory entitlements.

The case involves cross appeals arising from a judgment and decree dated 30.09.1992 in Special Civil Suit No. 102 of 1992. The plaintiffs, heirs of Di...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Dismissal of Employee for Gherao and Misconduct in Industrial Dispute Case. Employee's participation in gherao and shouting of slogans against management held to be misconduct under Standing Orders, and dismissal not disproportionate.

The appellant, Shri Sahil Khan, was one of seven employees of M/s Hashmat & Company who were charge-sheeted on 8.2.1992 for misconduct. The charge all...