Search Results for "structural safety"

199 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 199 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Municipal Commissioner's Order on Building Proposal Validity — Held That Commissioner's Decision Under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 Is Final and Not Subject to Judicial Review on Merits.

The petitioner, M/s Mahendra Builders, a partnership firm, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Heard PIL Challenging Development Permissions for Star Hotel in No Development Zone. The Court Considered Whether UDD Approval Under Regulation 59(3) and Additional FSI of 1.0 Were Valid Under DCRs and MRTP Act.

The case arose from a public interest litigation filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Recognizes Menstrual Hygiene as Integral to Right to Education and Dignity. Court Emphasizes State's Obligation to Provide Free Sanitary Pads and Separate Toilets in Schools Under Articles 14, 21, and 21A.

The writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution was filed by a social worker seeking judicial intervention to address the widespread lack of me...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Interim Relief in Housing Society's Suit for Conveyance and Challenging Construction Approvals. The Court Was Hearing a Notice of Motion and an Appeal from Order Regarding Alleged Unauthorized Construction and Failure to Execute Conveyance Under MOFA.

The judgment text provided is truncated and does not include the court's analysis or final decision. From the available text, the High Court was heari...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Building Construction Permissions as Barred by Res Judicata and Laches. The Court held that the petitioners had previously litigated the same issues and obtained no relief, and the PIL was filed after substantial construction had already been completed.

The Altamount Road Area Citizens Committee and another petitioner filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Bombay High Court challenging th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Cooperative Society's Bye-Law Amendment for Non-Compliance with Section 22 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. Amendment to Bye-Law 26(c) set aside as notice of meeting did not contain proposed amendment.

The petitioner, Sadguru University CHS Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging the amendment to Bye-Law 26(c) of the respondent society, Sadguru Premi...