Search Results for "speculative transaction"

98 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 98 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Contract Dispute for Lack of Merit. Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenge fails as no patent illegality or perversity found in award rejecting damages for breach of contract.

The present petition was filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award dated 25th March 2021 pas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Summary Judgment in Recovery Suit Against DDA for Refund of Sale Consideration After Land Acquisition Lapses. The Court held that DDA cannot retain the money after failing to convey title due to lapsing of acquisition, and the suit was within limitation.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal against the Delhi High Court's order dismissing the appellant's application for summary judgment under Order XIII...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSEDCL's Application to Declare Arbitral Award Satisfied as Vexatious and Dilatory. Unilateral Deposit of Disputed Amount Without Decree-Holder's Consent Does Not Discharge Judgment-Debtor Under Section 31 CPC.

The case involves a Chamber Summons filed by Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL), the unsuccessful respondent in an ar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Conditions for Land Conversion — Land Granted on New and Impartible Tenure Remains Occupancy Class II and Subject to Unearned Income Payment Under Section 29 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

The petitioner, M/s. Niketan Land and Estate Pvt. Ltd., challenged an order dated 24/02/2010 passed by the Collector, Nashik, which allowed the conver...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Winding-Up Petition Against Kingfisher Airlines Ltd. for Lack of Service of Statutory Notice. Petition under Sections 433(e) and (f) of the Companies Act, 1956 fails as petitioner Aerotron Limited did not prove service of demand notice under Section 434.

The petitioner, Aerotron Limited, a company incorporated under the laws of England and Wales, filed a winding-up petition under Sections 433(e) and (f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Winding Up Petition Against Airline Company for Inability to Pay Debts Under Companies Act, 1956. The court held that the company was commercially insolvent and unable to pay its debts, and appointed the Official Liquidator to take charge of its assets.

The petitioner, Aerotron Limited, a company incorporated under the laws of England and Wales, filed a company petition under Sections 433(e) and (f) r...