High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Writ Petition in Labour Matter. Order Reserved on 24 April 2025.
24 Apr 2025...
Search Results for "skill test"
199 result(s) found
Found 199 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision Striking Down Residence-Based Reservation in PG Medical Courses. Domicile or residence-based reservation in State Quota for Post Graduate Medical Courses violates Article 14 of the Constitution of India, as held in Saurabh Chaudri and Pradeep Jain.
1 Jan 2025The case arose from the Union Territory of Chandigarh, which has only one medical college, Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh. The pr...
- 699
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Visually Impaired Student to Pursue Physiotherapy — Strikes Down Blanket Ban as Unconstitutional. The court held that a complete prohibition on persons with visual impairment from studying or practicing physiotherapy violates Article 14 and the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, and directed individual assessment.
20 Jun 2023The petitioner, Zill Suresh Jain, a student aged 18 years, suffers from low vision with a 40% visual impairment. She completed her SSC in March 2020 a...
- 39
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Quashes Medical Negligence Finding Against Doctor and Hospital in Consumer Dispute - Reverses NCDRC Order Due to Lack of Evidence. The Court held that the complainant failed to provide sufficient material or medical evidence to establish negligence under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, as mere unfavorable outcome or untoward incident does not per se constitute negligence.
7 Sep 2021The dispute arose from a consumer complaint alleging medical negligence against a doctor and a hospital following the death of a patient after a secon...
- 259
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark and Copyright Infringement Suit Over Soybean Oil Labels — Deceptive Similarity Established Despite Minor Variations. The court held that the defendant's label for soybean oil was deceptively similar to the plaintiff's registered label mark and artistic work, and granted an interim injunction under the Trade Marks Act, 1999 and the Copyright Act, 1957.
9 Mar 2021The plaintiff, Sanjay Soya Private Limited, filed a suit for trademark and copyright infringement against the defendant, Narayani Trading Company, all...
- 23
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Doctors in Medical Negligence Case — No Prima Facie Case Under Section 304A IPC. Allegations of Rash or Negligent Act Not Made Out as Treatment Was Given in Good Faith and No Gross Negligence Established.
6 Jul 2017The Bombay High Court at Nagpur Bench heard two criminal applications filed by Dr. Pradeep Sadashiv Wankhede and Dr. Abhishek Vasantrao Sondawale, bot...
- 77
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Copyright Infringement and Passing Off Action Over Television Talent Show Format. Zee Entertainment's 'India's Best Dramebaaz' Concept Found Prima Facie Copied by Sony's 'Drama Company'.
5 Apr 2017The plaintiff, Zee Entertainment Enterprises Ltd, filed a quia timet copyright infringement and passing off action against Sony Pictures Networks Indi...
- 135
High Court
Karnataka High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Service Tax on Renting of Hotels and Restaurants. Sub-clauses (ZZZZV) and (ZZZZW) of Section 65(105) of Finance Act, 1994 as amended by Finance Act, 2011 held to be within legislative competence of Parliament.
3 Nov 2014The case involves three writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the Karnataka High Court. The petitioners ...
- 50
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Trademark Infringement Suit for ANTITHYROX and THYROX Against Defendant's LETHYROX. No deceptive similarity found as prefix 'LE' distinguishes marks and THYROX is descriptive of thyroid treatment.
29 May 2013The Plaintiff, Macleods Pharmaceuticals Limited, filed a suit against Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and another for infringement of their registered trad...
- 24
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Tribunal's Decision that Photocopying is Not a Works Contract Under Maharashtra Sales Tax on Works Contract Act. Activity of taking xerox copies does not involve transfer of property in goods, and the person carrying out such activity is not a 'dealer' under Section 2(1)(d) of the Maharashtra Sales Tax on Transfer of Property in Goods involved in Execution of Works Contract (Re-enacted) Act, 1989.
3 Mar 2006The case involves a Sales Tax Reference under Section 61 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, at the instance of the Commissioner of Sales Tax, Maharash...
- 62
