Search Results for "similarly situated institutions"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "similarly situated institutions"

428 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 428 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Validity of Premium Floor Area Ratio Scheme and Rejects Challenges Under Articles 14, 21, 243ZE, and 300A of Constitution. Section 18-B of Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 and Section 38-D of Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 Held Not Violative of Constitution, and All Impugned Notifications Sustained.

15 Jun 2026

The matter concerns a batch of cases challenging the constitutional validity of statutory provisions introducing the Premium Floor Area Ratio (FAR) sc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Claimants' Appeal in Part and Dismisses State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Market Value of Rs. 1,00,000 per Hectare Upheld with Reduced Deduction for Small Landholders. Court Relies on Precedent for Same Village and Modifies Development Charges Deduction from 30% to 20% for Landholders with Less Than 2 Hectares.

27 Sep 2022

The case involves two cross-appeals arising from land acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, for the Katepurna Morna Project in...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Enhances Compensation for Land Acquisition in Katepurna Morna Project — Market Value Determined at Rs. 1,00,000 per Acre with Additional Statutory Benefits. The court relied on comparable sales and potential value of agricultural land near urban area to fix compensation under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

27 Sep 2022

The case involves two appeals arising from a common judgment of the Reference Court in Land Acquisition Case No. 183 of 2000, concerning the acquisiti...

High Court

Bombay High Court hears writ petitions seeking pensionary benefits for retired employees of Water and Land Management Institute under Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982. Petitioners challenge State Government's refusal to grant pension communicated on 05.03.2013.

20 Jul 2018

The case involved three writ petitions filed by employees and retired employees of the Water and Land Management Institute (WALMI) at Aurangabad, chal...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Conditionally Leaves to Defend for Guarantors in Summary Suit, Rejecting DRT Jurisdiction and IBC Moratorium Claims. A Non-Banking Financial Institution's Summary Suit Against Guarantors is Maintainable Under Order XXXVII CPC, and Section 14 IBC Moratorium Does Not Bar Proceedings Against Guarantors.

28 Nov 2017

The plaintiff, a non-banking financial institution, filed a summary suit under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 against two guarantor...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Against Order of Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal in Recovery Proceedings. The Case Involves Settlement and Auction of Property of Bradbury Mills Ltd., a Company in Liquidation, with Multiple Creditors and Guarantors.

28 Aug 2017

The writ petition was filed by Everest Fincap Pvt. Ltd. challenging an order of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) dated 22 August 2008, whic...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Notifications Under Act of 2013 for Rural Water Storage Tank — Multiplier of Two Not Applicable. Court holds that Section 26 read with First Schedule of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 does not mandate multiplier of two for rural land acquisition as the land is not in an urban area.

9 Mar 2015

The petitioner, Panjabrao Borade, filed a writ petition challenging notifications dated 19.3.2014 and 13.8.2014 issued by the Deputy Secretary to the ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Division Bench Hears Builder's Appeal Against Single Judge's Order Partly Quashing Stop Construction Notice and Directing Objections Under KIAD Act. The Full Bench Reserves Judgment on 06-02-2014, but the Final Decision is Not Available in the Provided Incomplete Text.

11 Apr 2014

The case involves writ appeals filed by M/s Century Central, a registered partnership firm, challenging the order dated 02/07/2013 passed by a learned...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State's Appeal and Allows Cross-Objection in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Market Value Determined Based on Sale Deed of Similar Land. The court upheld the Reference Court's enhancement of compensation for land acquired for a highway project, applying the comparable sales method with appropriate deductions for development.

12 Feb 2013

The case pertains to land acquisition for a highway project in Bijapur, Karnataka. The landowner, Smt. Kamalabai, owned agricultural land that was acq...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging DRT Orders on Limitation Act Applicability to RDDBFI Act Appeals. Court Holds Section 5 of Limitation Act Applies to Appeals Under Section 30 of RDDBFI Act, Rejecting Petitioners' Argument That Special Statute Excludes Limitation Act.

13 Oct 2011

The petitioners, owners of apartments in Jupiter Complex, Nagpur, challenged orders of the Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT) and Debts Recovery Appellate ...

7 8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)