Search Results for "service inam"

102 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 102 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Declares Adopted Son's Alienations Not Binding on Widow's Share. Hindu Succession Act, 1956 Sections 14 and 6 applied to protect widow's pre-existing right of maintenance and partition.

The case involves a second appeal by the legal heirs of the original plaintiff, Housabai, against the judgment and decree of the 3rd Additional Distri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Adoption and Hindu Succession Rights Upheld. Plaintiff's 1/2 share in suit properties declared, sale deeds by adopted son held not binding on adoptive mother.

The original plaintiff, Housabai, filed a suit for partition and separate possession of suit lands, claiming a 1/2 share as the widow of her husband w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Mutation Entries in Land Revenue Records, Upholding Concurrent Findings of Civil Courts. Petitioners failed to establish possession or title over suit lands; mutation entries held not conferring title under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

The case involves multiple writ petitions filed by various petitioners challenging mutation entries made in the revenue records in favor of the origin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Concurrent Findings Upheld. Plaintiff Failed to Prove Title and Possession Over Suit Property; Non-Examination of Attesting Witnesses to Sale Deed Led to Adverse Inference.

The legal representatives of the original plaintiff in O.S. No. 104/1982 (old No. 215/1968) filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Land Allotment to Private Company in Title Dispute. Court holds that disputed questions of title cannot be adjudicated in PIL jurisdiction and that the petitioners failed to establish that the land was government property.

The case is a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by two petitioners, Mr. Chetan Kamble and Mr. Vilas V. Devrukhkar, against the State of Maharasht...