Search Results for "secured asset"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "secured asset"

422 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 422 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal by Asset Reconstruction Company Against Borrowers in SARFAESI Act Matter — Upholds Single Judge's Order Quashing Possession Notice Due to Non-Compliance with Section 13(2) and (3A). The Court Held That the Secured Creditor Must Strictly Adhere to the Statutory Procedure Under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 Before Taking Possession.

5 Jun 2024

The appellant, M/s. International Asset Reconstruction Company Limited, a secured creditor, issued a possession notice under the Securitisation and Re...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes IBBI Circular as Ultra Vires in Insolvency Professional Regulation — Circular Purporting to Clarify Regulation 4(2)(b) of LP Regulations Held to Be an Impermissible Retrospective Amendment.

4 Apr 2024

The petitioner, Amit Gupta, a chartered accountant and registered insolvency professional, challenged a circular dated 28 September 2023 issued by the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Assignee of Debt to Proceed Under SARFAESI Act Despite Company Being Under Liquidation. Assignee Steps into Shoes of Original Lender and Can Enforce Security Interest Under Section 13 of SARFAESI Act, 2002.

13 Dec 2019

The petitioner, ASREC (India) Limited, is a company registered as a Reconstruction Company and Securitisation Company with the Reserve Bank of India u...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Refund of Rs.40 Crores Deposited by Borrower in SARFAESI Act Proceedings — Deposit Made to Show Bona Fides, Not as Payment of Dues. The Court held that a deposit made pursuant to an interim order to demonstrate bona fides cannot be appropriated by the Bank when the interim order is set aside and the OTS is rejected.

20 Aug 2019

The case arises from a dispute between M/s Kut Energy Pvt. Ltd. and others (appellants/borrowers) and Punjab National Bank and others (respondents) co...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Shareholder's Application for Official Liquidator Supervision of SARFAESI Sale — Secured Creditor's Right to Sell Under SARFAESI Act Prevails Over Company Court's Supervisory Jurisdiction. The court held that a promoter-shareholder of a company in liquidation cannot seek supervision of the sale of secured assets by a secured creditor under the SARFAESI Act, 2002, as the secured creditor has an independent right to sell without interference from the Company Court.

11 Nov 2016

The applicant, Rashmi Thakeria, a promoter-shareholder of Natural Textiles Private Limited (in liquidation), filed C.A.No.969/2015 seeking a direction...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Decree-Holder in Execution Proceedings, Setting Aside Dismissal as Time-Barred. The court held that filing chamber summons and other applications constituted steps in aid of execution, extending limitation under Article 136 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

18 Oct 2016

The case involves an appeal by Pratap G. Somaiya (the appellant/decree-holder) against an order dismissing his execution application as time-barred. T...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Predeposit Condition for Appeal Against Interlocutory Order Under SARFAESI Act. Section 18(1) of SARFAESI Act, 2002 Requires Deposit of 50% of Debt for Any Appeal Under Section 17, Including Interlocutory Orders, and Appellate Tribunal May Reduce to 25%.

16 Nov 2010

The petitioners, M/s Vinay Container Services Pvt. Ltd. and its guarantors, challenged an order of the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) which ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Substitution of Assignee in Pending DRT Proceedings Under SARFAESI Act. Assignment of debt under Section 5 of SARFAESI Act entitles assignee to continue pending recovery proceedings without fresh filing, and amendment of cause title is permissible.

9 Aug 2010

The petitioner, Alpha and Omega Diagnostics India Ltd., challenged a common order of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) which upheld the orde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Secured Creditor's Writ Petition Against District Magistrate's Refusal to Assist Under Section 14 SARFAESI Act. District Magistrate Cannot Refuse Assistance on Grounds of Disputed Title or Pending Civil Suit.

19 Mar 2010

The petitioner, SICOM Ltd., a financial corporation, had loaned Rs. 4 crores to M/s Sonaa Oil & Chemical Industries Ltd. Respondent No. 2 was a guaran...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging SARFAESI Auction for Non-Compliance with Undertaking. Failure to Pay Agreed Amount and Challenge Auction Notice After Possession Constitutes Waiver of Right to Challenge Under Section 13(4) of Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.

31 Jan 2005

The petitioners, Mr. Manoj D. Kapasi and Ruby Coach Building Company, owed Rs.3,64,78,000 to respondent No.2 bank. The bank issued a notice under Sect...

7 8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)