Search Results for "retirement benefits"

92 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 92 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Municipal Corporations' Appeals, Holds Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Applicable to Local Bodies via Central Notification. The Act overrides inconsistent state regulations, entitling employees to gratuity under the Act.

The Supreme Court dismissed two civil appeals filed by Nagar Ayukt Nagar Nigam, Kanpur and Nagar Nigam, Gorakhpur against orders of the Allahabad High...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Municipal Corporations' Appeals, Holds Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Applicable to Local Bodies. Municipal Employees Entitled to Gratuity Under Central Act Despite State Regulations Providing Lower Benefits.

The Supreme Court dismissed two civil appeals filed by Municipal Corporations of Kanpur and Gorakhpur against High Court orders upholding the Controll...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Former OCS Employees Seeking Government Pension After Absorption in VSNL. Eligibility for Pension Under Office Memorandum Requires Minimum 10 Years of Qualifying Service on Date of Absorption.

The present Civil Appeal arose out of a challenge to the Judgment and Order dated January 13, 2016 passed by the Bombay High Court in Writ Petition No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Pension Interest Case — No Interest on Delayed DCRG and CVP When Judicial Proceedings Were Pending at Retirement. Rule 4 of Central Civil Services (Commutation of Pension) Rules, 1981 disentitles commutation during pendency of judicial proceedings.

The case pertains to an appeal by the Chief General Manager, Gujarat Telecom Circle, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. and others against the judgment of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Against Kerala High Court Judgment Upholding CAT Order for Inclusion in Promotion Panel. Delay and Laches Not a Bar as Representation Was Replied and Tribunal Condoned Delay.

The case involves a dispute over promotion to the post of Assistant Personnel Officer (APO) in the Southern Railway under the 30% Limited Departmental...