Search Results for "refund processing"

240 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 240 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Mill Challenging Order to Grant Permanency to Re-employed Clerks. Voluntary Retirement Does Not Bar Claim for Permanency for Subsequent Continuous Service Under Industrial Law.

The petitioner, Shree Ram Mills Limited, challenged an order of the Industrial Court, Mumbai, which allowed a complaint filed by the respondent union,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Denial of Exemption Under Notification No.119/75 for Job Work — Goods Manufactured on Job Work Basis Eligible for Duty Exemption on Job Charges

The Petitioner, M/s Godrej Soap Ltd., filed a Writ Petition challenging an order dated 23.3.1989 passed by the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals) d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Condition No. 5 of NOCs for Redevelopment Projects — Condition Imposing Payment of Expenditure Incurred by Board Held Unauthorized and Without Legal Basis. Court directs refund of amounts paid under protest pursuant to the impugned condition.

The Petitioner, Chandulal Jorawarmal Mehta, a sole proprietor of Mehta Developers, filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of Indi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Labour Court Award of Reinstatement with Continuity and Back Wages for 19 Workmen. Workmen's Writ Petition for Full Back Wages Allowed in Part, Reducing Back Wages to 50%.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions arising from a common award of the Labour Court, Aurangabad, in Reference (IDA) No. 10/2012. The first petiti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition for Condonation of Delay in Investment Under Section 54EC of Income Tax Act, 1961 — CBDT's Rejection Set Aside. The CBDT's power under Section 119(2)(b) is not circumscribed by any time limit and must be exercised liberally to avoid hardship.

The petitioner, Dr. Sujatha Ramesh, sold an immovable property during the Assessment Year 2013-14 and realized long-term capital gains. To claim exemp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Assessee's Reference in Sales Tax Classification Case — PVC Pipes Not Agricultural Machinery. Assessee Entitled to Refund of Excess Tax Collected Under Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959.

The case involves two sales tax references under Section 61(1) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, at the instance of the assessee, M/s. Patankar Broth...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition by Mutual Fund Against Sales Tax Reassessment Orders — Holds Mutual Fund Not a Dealer Under MVAT Act, 2002. Reassessment Proceedings Initiated Beyond Limitation Period and Without Proper Sanction Are Invalid.

The petitioner, Axis Mutual Fund, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging several orders passed by the sales ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Winding Up Order for Non-Payment of Debts Under Companies Act, 1956. Debt Acknowledged in Balance Sheets and Not Disputed, Constituting Admission of Liability Under Section 433(e) and 434 of Companies Act, 1956.

The judgment arises from four appeals filed by M/s. RojeeTasha Stampings Private Ltd., M/s. Automotive Metal Stampings Pvt. Ltd., M/s. Ganage Pressing...