Search Results for "rebuttable presumption"

298 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 298 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Clarifies Legal Insanity Defence Under Section 84 IPC and Burden of Proof Under Section 105 Evidence Act. The court held that insanity must be legal, not medical, to exempt from criminal liability, with the accused bearing the burden of proof on a preponderance of probabilities standard.

The judgment involved an appeal where the appellant raised the plea of insanity under Section 84 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, seeking reversal of a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Cheque Bounce Case — Conviction and Fine of Rs.1.80 Crore Upheld. Dishonour of Cheque for Rs.90 Lakhs Issued Towards Repayment of Loan — Presumption Under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Not Rebutted by Accused.

The case involves a criminal revision petition filed by the accused (Maxworth Realty India Ltd. and its Chairman & Managing Director K. Kesava) challe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Reverses Acquittal. Presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 stands unless accused rebuts with probable defence.

The appellant/complainant filed a criminal appeal under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the judgment of acquittal ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Conviction in Cheque Dishonour Case — Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Not Rebutted. Accused Failed to Prove Defence of Blank Cheque Given as Security, Leading to Confirmation of Sentence Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The case arises from a complaint filed by the respondent (complainant) against the petitioner (accused) under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Cheque Bounce Case Under Section 138 NI Act — Presumption of Legally Enforceable Debt Not Rebutted. Accused Failed to Prove That Cheque Was Not Issued for Discharge of Any Debt or Liability, Leading to Confirmation of Concurrent Sentence of Six Months.

The case arises from a criminal revision application filed by the accused, Krishna Gudi, against the judgment and order of the Additional Sessions Jud...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Legal Representatives' Petition Against Eviction Decree for Subletting Without Consent. Subletting of Tenanted Premises Without Landlord's Consent Constitutes Unauthorized Transfer Under Section 15 of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.

The petitioners, legal representatives of the original tenant Vatsala Krishna Jadhav, challenged the eviction decree passed against them by the courts...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Criminal Applications Challenging Magistrate's Orders in Private Complaint Cases — Reiterates Limited Scope of Revision Against Interlocutory Orders Under Section 397 CrPC. Order Issuing Process Under Section 204 CrPC is Interlocutory and Not Subject to Revision.

The judgment involves multiple criminal applications filed before the Bombay High Court challenging orders passed by Magistrates issuing process again...