Search Results for "re-settlement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "re-settlement"

490 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 490 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Civil Court Decree in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Petitioner Failed to Establish Entitlement to Higher Compensation Under Section 28A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The court held that the petitioner, having sought reference under Section 18, was not entitled to re-determination under Section 28A, and the issue was barred by res judicata.

20 Aug 2025

The petitioner, the Defense Estate Officer, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and decree dated 30.09.2024 passed by the Senior Civil Judg...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Execution Court Order in Land Acquisition Dispute — Defense Estate Officer Succeeds in Setting Aside Ex-Parte Order Due to Lack of Notice. The Court held that the execution court failed to issue notice to the judgment debtor before proceeding with execution, violating principles of natural justice under Order XXI Rule 22 CPC.

20 Aug 2025

The petitioner, The Defense Estate Officer, Karnataka and Goa Circle, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India se...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Release of Land from Reservation for Primary School Under Section 127 of MRTP Act, 1966 — Landowner's Withdrawal of Consent for TDR Valid Due to Acquiring Body's Delay. The court held that the land reserved for a primary school stood released from reservation as the acquiring body failed to acquire the land within the statutory period, and the landowner's withdrawal of consent for TDR was valid due to the acquiring body's delay.

17 Apr 2024

The petitioners, owners of land bearing Gut No. 114 in Village Pimprala, Jalgaon, within the municipal limits of Jalgaon Municipal Corporation, sought...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Claim for Shortfall Land Due to Delay and Laches. Claim for balance land under Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act, 1999 rejected as application made 37 years after acquisition award and 20 years after enactment without explanation.

26 Jul 2023

The petitioner, legal heir of Tatoba Rama Chavan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the resp...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Road Widening Project — Petitioners Failed to Demonstrate Violation of Statutory Provisions or Fundamental Rights. The court held that the acquisition was for a public purpose and that the petitioners' remedy lay in seeking enhancement of compensation under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, rather than challenging the acquisition itself.

7 Jul 2023

The petitioners, owners of land in Village Wagholi, Pune, challenged the acquisition of their land for a road widening project by the State of Maharas...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging 1985 Slum Tribunal Order Due to 34-Year Delay. Petitioners' challenge to Maharashtra Slum Area Tribunal order dismissed on grounds of laches and acquiescence under Article 227 of the Constitution.

30 Jun 2023

The petitioners, Pravinbhai Ratanji Lad, Kaushik Dalpatbhai Mistry, and Mayank D. Thakkar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Land Reservation Lapses Only Upon Valid Notice Under Section 127 of MRTP Act, Not Mere Passage of Time. The court ruled that without a valid notice under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, the High Court cannot declare reserved land free from reservation even after an inordinate delay.

13 Mar 2023

The case involves two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, by three pet...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Lapse and Subsequent Possession Under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 — Held that Once Acquisition Lapses, Possession Cannot Be Retained Without Fresh Proceedings.

9 Dec 2021

The petitioners, owners of agricultural lands in Golatgaon, Aurangabad, challenged the acquisition of their lands under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Lapsation of Land Reservations Under MRTP Act — Failure to Acquire Land Within Ten Years Results in Deemed Lapse. Reservation for Public Offices and Truck Terminal on Petitioner's Land Held Lapsed as No Acquisition Proceedings Were Initiated Within Statutory Period Under Section 127 of MRTP Act, 1966.

11 Aug 2021

The petitioner, Sakharam Mahadev Jadhav, was the owner of lands bearing Survey No.69/1 and 69/2/1 situated at Village Belavali, Taluka Ambarnath, Dist...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Land Acquisition Case Due to Non-Communication of Award Under Section 12(2) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Proceedings Lapse Under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 as Award Not Communicated Before New Act Came Into Force.

4 Aug 2016

The petitioners, Jitesh Bhaiyalal Sahu and Rashmi Jitesh Sahu, owned 1.95 hectares of land in Mouza Morangana, Amravati. The State initiated acquisiti...

7 8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)