Search Results for "qualifying period"

701 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 701 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Assistant Teacher in Private Aided School — Violation of Natural Justice and Section 5 of M.E.P.S. Act, 1977. Termination order set aside as no prior approval was obtained from the Education Officer before dismissal.

The petitioner, Vijaykumar Raosaheb Kulkarni, was an assistant teacher employed by the Rasta Peth Education Society, which runs a private aided school...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Pension Claim of Employee Transferred from Government Institute to Government Company. Holds That Pensionary Benefits Cannot Be Denied on Ground of Transfer Without Option to Retain Government Pension Under Article 14 of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Prakash Parshuram Mavlankar, was employed with the erstwhile Haffkine Institute, a government entity under the State of Maharashtra, f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Management's Petition Challenging Reinstatement of Teacher in Voluntary Retirement Case. Acceptance of Voluntary Retirement Without Statutory Notice Period Under Section 5(3) of MEPS Act, 1977 Held Illegal.

The petitioner, Shri Guru Buddhiswami Mahavidyalaya (the Management), challenged the judgment and order dated 06/12/2013 of the School Tribunal, Latur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Management's Petition Challenging Reinstatement of Teacher in Voluntary Retirement Dispute. Acceptance of Voluntary Retirement Without Allowing Withdrawal Within Notice Period Under Section 7(2) of MEPS Act, 1977 Held Illegal.

The petitioner, Shri Guru Buddhiswami Mahavidyalaya, through its Secretary and Principal, challenged the judgment and order dated 06/12/2013 of the Sc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Lecturer's Petition for Pensionary Benefits Due to Break in Service. Break in service caused by insufficient workload cannot be condoned for pension eligibility under UGC Regulations.

The petitioner, Dr. (Mrs.) Mangala Veeresh, was appointed as a full-time Lecturer in Zoology at Smt. Parvatibai Chowgule College of Arts & Science (re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Release of Retirement Dues to Former President of Administrative Tribunal — Pension and Gratuity to Be Paid with 8% Interest. The court held that retirement benefits are not dependent on validity of appointment but on actual service rendered.

The petitioner, an advocate since 1979, was appointed as President of the Goa Administrative Tribunal on 24.10.2001. His appointment was challenged in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Tender Award in Contractual Dispute — No Arbitrariness Found in Evaluation of Techno-Commercial Bids. Tender Inviting Authority is Best Judge of Bidder Suitability; Court's Interference Limited to Cases of Arbitrariness or Mala Fides.

The petitioner, M/s M.F. Jain Engineers and Contractors, challenged the allotment of a tender work (Tender Code No.36012 dated 2nd November 2013) by r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Retired Railway Employee's Petition for Inclusion of Apprenticeship Period as Qualifying Service for Pension. Gap of 45 Days Between Completion of Apprenticeship and Regular Posting Breaks Continuity, Disentitling Claim for Pensionary Benefits.

The petitioner, a retired Railway employee, was appointed as an Apprentice Telecom Inspector on 23/12/1964 and completed his two-year apprenticeship o...