Search Results for "promotion orders"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "promotion orders"

1928 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1928 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Kalaburagi Bench Allows Writ Petition Challenging Central Administrative Tribunal Order Granting MACP-III Benefits. Selection as Postal Assistant After Limited Departmental Competitive Examination Treated as Promotion, Disentitling Employee from Third Financial Upgradation Under MACP Scheme, Relying on Precedent.

11 Aug 2022

The case pertains to a retired Sub Postmaster who sought the benefit of the Modified Assured Career Progression (MACP) scheme, specifically the third ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Primary Teacher for Promotion to Secondary School Teacher Based on D.Ed. Qualification Date. Seniority under Government Circular dated 21.5.2004 is determined by date of acquiring D.Ed. qualification, not appointment date.

1 Dec 2015

The petitioner, Mohammad Abdul Quadeer, a primary school teacher with D.Ed. qualification acquired on 16.6.2001, was appointed as Shikshan Sevak on 19...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Service Promotion Dispute — Continuous Service Under Recruitment Rules Must Be Actual Service, Not Deemed Date. The Court held that the deemed date of promotion under Seniority Rules cannot be treated as actual continuous service for eligibility under Recruitment Rules, quashing the promotion of Respondent No. 3 to Section Officer.

10 May 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Girish Kumar against the judgment of the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) which had upheld the promo...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Promotion Dispute Due to Non-Communication of APAR Entries. Failure to Disclose Annual Performance Appraisal Report Entries Violates Principles of Natural Justice and Law Laid Down in Dev Dutt and Sukhdev Singh.

10 Jul 2019

The dispute arose from the appellant's claim for promotion from Scale III to Scale IV in United India Insurance Co Ltd for the year 2014-2015. The app...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Judgment in Service Promotion Case Due to Factual Error and Overlapping Issues. The Court Ordered Transfer of Writ Petition from Allahabad High Court to Delhi High Court for Joint Hearing with Related Petition Regarding Promotion Grievances Across Multiple Years.

22 Mar 2022

The dispute originated from the appellant's grievance regarding non-promotion from Deputy Manager (Scale III) to Manager (Scale IV) in an insurance co...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Accelerated Promotion for Degree-Holding Junior Engineers in Uttarakhand Irrigation Department. The court held that the 7.33% accelerated promotion quota for Degree-holders is valid under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution, as it is based on intelligible differentia and has a rational nexus with the object of encouraging higher qualifications.

14 Oct 2019

The dispute pertains to the Irrigation Department cadre of the Uttarakhand State, concerning promotion from Junior Engineer (JE) to Assistant Engineer...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Promotion Policy Based on Merit-Cum-Seniority in High Court Administration. Court upholds that marks in departmental examination are not the sole criterion for promotion and that seniority can be given weightage under the applicable rules.

15 Jun 2022

The petitioner, Kishore D. Raorane, joined the High Court administration on the Original Side as a Clerk in 1985 and retired as Master (Adm) in 2021. ...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, Adjudicates Bunch of Writ Petitions Challenging Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal Order on Seniority in Maharashtra Development Service Cadre. Dispute Pertains to Interpretation of Recruitment Quota Rules under Maharashtra Development Service (Constitution, Classification and Recruitment) Rules, 1973, and Whether Promotions Exceeding Quota Are Fortuitous.

21 Mar 2012

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, heard a bunch of writ petitions arising from a common order of the Maharashtra Administra...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Retired Employee's Petition Against Recovery of Excess Payment Under Time Bound Promotion Scheme. Recovery of Rs.2,58,711/- Set Aside as No Misrepresentation by Employee and Recovery Ordered Without Notice Violates Natural Justice.

16 Sep 2022

The petitioner, Ajabrao Rambhau Patil, was appointed as Technical Assistant on 16.02.1982 in the office of respondent no.3. The post was later abolish...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Tribunal Order Directing Promotion of Police Officer Despite Adverse Grading. Promotion to Police Inspector based on seniority-cum-fitness requires average 'B' grading; a single 'C' grading in relevant period does not automatically disqualify if overall average is 'B'.

25 Apr 2006

The State of Maharashtra filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and order of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal dated 23rd March 2001, wh...

7 8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)