Search Results for "presumptions"

543 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 543 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Disputed Liability. Complainant failed to prove legally enforceable debt as accused raised probable defence of cash payment for goods not supplied under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The appellant, Sheshrao Krishnarao Umredkar, proprietor of M/s Rakesh Enterprises, filed a criminal appeal challenging the judgment and order dated 29...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Acquittal Set Aside Due to Improper Appreciation of Evidence. Presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 stands in favor of complainant unless rebutted by accused.

The appellant, Mahesh Urban Credit Coop. Society Ltd., through its manager, filed a criminal appeal challenging the acquittal of the respondent, Naray...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction Under Section 138 NI Act for Dishonour of Cheques Issued in Discharge of Liability — Service of Notice by Registered Post Deemed Sufficient Despite Return as Undelivered.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by the accused against his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 188...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Complainant in Life Insurance Claim Repudiation Case — Insurer Failed to Prove Suppression of Material Facts. Non-disclosure of existing policies not established by documentary evidence; burden of proof under Section 45 Insurance Act, 1938 not discharged.

The present civil appeal arises from the repudiation of life insurance claims by Future Generali India Life Insurance Company Limited. The appellant, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision in Cheque Dishonour Case — Conviction Upheld. Presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 not rebutted as accused failed to prove repayment of hand loan.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by the accused, Manoj Ghansham Birla, against his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiab...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in CBI Bribery Case Due to Lack of Independent Witnesses and Procedural Lapses. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Rajesh Mopkar, a clerk in the Income Tax Office, Nagpur, was convicted by the Special Judge, Nagpur, for demanding and accepting a brib...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant in NDPS Act Case for Smuggling Heroin in Suitcases. Circumstantial Evidence Including Possession of Keys, Baggage Tags, and Concealment of Contraband Sufficient to Prove Conscious Possession Under Section 21(c) of NDPS Act, 1985.

The appellant, Mrs. Agnes Ruddy Odhoch, a Kenyan national, was convicted by the Special Judge, Greater Mumbai, for offences under Sections 21(c), 23(c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Applications in International Commercial Arbitration — Habitual Residence Determined at Time of Agreement. Applicant Residing in UAE at Time of Agreement Held to be Habitually Resident Outside India Under Section 2(1)(f)(i) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The judgment concerns three arbitration applications filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, by Aslam Ismail Khan Deshmu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Restores Conviction Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Presumption of Legally Enforceable Debt Under Section 139 N.I. Act Stands Unless Accused Rebuts with Probable Defence.

The appellant, Dilip Virumal Ahuja, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the judgment and...