Search Results for "press meet"

513 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 513 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Application for Appointment of Receiver in Partition Suit. Notice of Motion Seeks Interim Relief for Joint Family Properties Allegedly Misappropriated by Co-Owners.

The plaintiff filed a suit for declaration that he is entitled to a 1/10th share in the assets and properties of the joint family and for partition by...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Ruling on Karnataka EMTA Coal Mines Limited: A Complex Case Involving Coal Block Allocation and Legal Interpretations. A detailed examination of the legal challenges surrounding the joint venture agreements, audit reports, and allegations of criminal conspiracy in the coal mining sector.

The Supreme Court of India addressed the appeals filed by M/s. Karnataka EMTA Coal Mines Limited and its Managing Director, challenging the charges fr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlords' Petition for Eviction on Ground of Reasonable and Bona Fide Requirement — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Landlord's Own Witness Admitted No Need for Possession, Defeating Claim Under Rent Control Law.

The petitioners, landlords of commercial premises in Kolhapur, filed a suit for eviction against the tenant on grounds of non-user, erection of perman...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses RTI Activist's Petition Seeking Income Tax Returns of Public Figure. Holds That Personal Information of Third Party Cannot Be Disclosed Unless Larger Public Interest Is Established Under Section 8(1)(j) of RTI Act, 2005.

The petitioner, Shailesh Gandhi, an RTI activist and former Central Information Commissioner, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Interception Orders of Petitioner in Indian Telegraph Act Case Due to Absence of Public Emergency or Interest of Public Safety. The Court Held That Telephone Interception Without Proper Statutory Compliance Violates Right to Privacy and Intercepted Material Must Be Destroyed.

The petitioner, a businessman, challenged three orders dated 29 October 2009, 18 December 2009, and 24 February 2010, by which his telephone calls wer...