KAHC010662922011_1
25 Jul 2025The judgment is a common order in House Rent Revision Petition Nos. 136/2011 and 115/2011, and Regular First Appeal No. 160/2021. The appellant, Smt. ...
Search Results for "possession and rent arrears"
766 result(s) found
Found 766 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Licensor in Eviction Dispute Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act — License Held for Residential Purpose. The court restored the eviction order of the Competent Authority, holding that the license was for residential purpose and the Competent Authority had jurisdiction under Section 24 of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.
12 Nov 2024The Petitioner, Deepak S. Kavadiya, is the owner of Flat No. A/1102, Juhu Griha Swapna CHSL, JVPD, Juhu, Vile Parle West, Mumbai-400056. Respondent No...
- 2612
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Tenants' Appeal in Rent Control Case — Striking Out Defence Not Automatic Under Section 15(7) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958. Discretionary Power Must Be Exercised Judiciously; Mere Non-Compliance Does Not Justify Striking Out Defence.
24 Sep 2019The case involves an appeal by tenants against the High Court of Delhi's order upholding the Rent Controller's decision to strike out their defence in...
- 292
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Landlords' Appeal in Rent Control Eviction Case Due to Insufficient Evidence of Danger to Tenanted Portions. Eviction Decrees Set Aside as Municipal Demolition Notice and Other Grounds Under Sections 15 and 16 of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 Were Not Satisfactorily Proven.
30 Jan 2024The dispute involved landlords appealing against a Bombay High Court judgment that invalidated eviction decrees against two tenants under the Maharash...
- 259
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Tenant's Writ Petition Against Eviction Order in Rent Control Case — Administrative Tribunal's Order Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice and Lack of Proper Inquiry Under Section 32(4) of Goa, Daman and Diu Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1968. The court held that the Tribunal failed to conduct a summary inquiry and give the tenant a fair hearing before directing eviction.
10 Oct 2013The petitioner, Smt. Kanchan Ramdas Morascar, was a tenant in a premises used for shoe business, originally leased to her father-in-law and later cont...
- 133
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Landlord's Petition and Dismisses Tenant's Petitions in Tenancy Dispute for Arrears of Rent and Bonafide Personal Cultivation. MRT's Re-appreciation of Evidence Without Jurisdictional Error Set Aside; Tenant's Failure to Deposit Arrears Leads to Eviction Under Section 25(2) of Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.
5 Jun 2023The dispute pertains to agricultural lands leased by the landlord to the tenant in 1943. The landlord filed Tenancy Case No. 08 of 1973 seeking posses...
- 451
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Applications in Rent Control Dispute — Licence vs. Lease Determination Under Bombay Rent Act, 1947. Agreement for use of shop premises held to be a lease, not a licence, based on exclusive possession and intention of parties.
8 Jan 2016The case involves two Civil Revision Applications filed by Messrs Miscellenary Marketers Pvt. Ltd. (defendants) against Messrs SunNSand Pvt. Ltd. (pla...
- 86
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Eviction Case Under Karnataka Rent Act, 1999 — Landlord's Bona Fide Requirement for Own Use Upheld. Tenant's Revision Challenging Eviction on Grounds of Bona Fide Requirement and Comparative Hardship Fails as Landlord's Need for Residential Premises for His Son's Family is Genuine and Greater Hardship Would Be Caused to Landlord.
20 Jan 2015The case involves a revision petition filed by the tenants (petitioners) against an eviction order passed by the Chief Judge, Small Causes Court, Bang...
- 112
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Order; Upholds Rent Controller's Jurisdiction Despite Absence of Written Lease Under Goa Rent Control Act, 1968. The Court Holds Section 34 of the Act to be Directory, Not Mandatory, and Refuses to Interfere with Concurrent Findings of Fact That the Tenant's Denial of Title Was Not Bonafide.
1 Feb 2018The petitioner, Abdul Sattar Kulli, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution before the High Court of Bombay at Goa, challenging th...
- 41
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Partly Allows Appeal in Rent Recovery Suit Concerning Forest Rights Lease; Holds Lessees Jointly Liable Under Section 43 of Indian Contract Act, 1872. Special Limitation Period of Bihar Tenancy Act, 1885 Governs Suit for Rent of Forest Produce, Barring Claim for Earlier Years, and Statutory Interest Rate of 6 1/4% Overrides Contractual Rate.
10 Oct 1968The litigation arose from a lease of forest rights executed on October 3, 1944, by the plaintiffs (along with other co-lessors) in favor of defendants...
