Search Results for "notice under Section 25(3)"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "notice under Section 25(3)"

354 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 354 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses State Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Upholds Enhanced Compensation Based on Comparable Sales and Statutory Benefits Under RFCTLARR Act, 2013. The court affirmed the Single Judge's reliance on sale deeds of adjacent lands to determine market value and grant of statutory benefits under Sections 23, 24, and 26 of the Act.

28 Apr 2026

The case involves a batch of writ appeals filed by the State of Tamil Nadu and its authorities against orders of a learned Single Judge dated 19.02.20...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses State's Suit Under Article 131 for Lack of Cause of Action and Suppression of Material Facts. The suit challenging the validity of notifications under the DSPE Act was held not maintainable as the dispute was not between the State and the Union but between the State and its own officers.

10 Jul 2024

The State of West Bengal filed a suit under Article 131 of the Constitution of India against the Union of India, challenging the validity of notificat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice in Income Tax Case Due to Lack of Fresh Material. Reopening Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Based on Mere Change of Opinion on Provision for Unascertained Liabilities is Invalid.

26 Feb 2024

The petitioner, Bajaj Auto Limited, filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2016-17 on 29 November 2016, declaring total income of Rs. 4,860,25...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice in Income Tax Case — No Failure to Disclose Material Facts. Reopening Beyond Four Years Invalid Under Section 147/148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 as Original Assessment Under Section 143(3) Was Full and True Disclosure.

26 Feb 2024

The petitioner, Bajaj Auto Limited, filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2016-17 on 29 November 2016 declaring total income of Rs. 4,860,25,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Being Time-Barred — Notice Issued Beyond Four-Year Limitation Period Without Proper Sanction. Reassessment Notice for AY 2019-2020 Issued on 12.04.2023 Held Without Jurisdiction as It Exceeded Limitation Under Section 149(1)(b) of Income Tax Act, 1961.

1 Aug 2023

The petitioner, Kartik Sureshchandra Gandhi, a businessman, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay Hig...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Reinstates Criminal Proceedings in Corruption Case Overturning High Court's Quashing of FIR. The Court held that authorization under Section 3 of J&K Prevention of Corruption Act, 2006 does not require a reasoned order, preliminary enquiry is permissible under Lalita Kumari, and the FIR disclosed cognizable offences of misappropriation under the Act.

29 Oct 2021

The dispute arose from criminal proceedings initiated against the respondent, a government official, for alleged corruption in the purchase of medical...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Secured Creditor's Priority Over Sales Tax Dues in MVAT Act Attachment Dispute. State Bank of India's mortgage charge on borrower's property held superior to VAT recovery under Section 32 of MVAT Act, 2002, following Central Bank of India v. State of Kerala ratio.

17 Dec 2020

The State Bank of India (SBI), a secured creditor, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the attachment of a propert...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Recovery Order Against State Agency for Exceeding 20% Limit Under Section 220(6) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Recovery of Rs.16,95,48,869/- for multiple assessment years held illegal as it exceeded the statutory limit of 20% pending appeal.

7 Aug 2018

The petitioner, Bidar Nirmiti Kendra, an agency of the State Government, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Transfer Pricing Reference and Order for Lack of Proper Approval Under Section 92D of Income-tax Act, 1961. The court held that the reference made by the Assessing Officer to the Transfer Pricing Officer without obtaining the requisite approval was invalid, and the subsequent order of the TPO was also invalid.

23 Dec 2011

The petitioner, M/s. Hindalco Industries Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging (i) an order dated 31 October 2...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding Up Petition in 50:50 Joint Venture Due to Availability of Buy-Out Remedy. Loss of mutual trust and confidence does not automatically justify winding up under Section 433(f) of the Companies Act, 1956 when one party is willing to purchase the other's shares.

21 Apr 2005

The petitioner, Severn Trent Water Purification Inc, filed a winding up petition under Section 433(f) of the Companies Act, 1956 against Capital Contr...

7 8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)