Search Results for "motor transport undertaking"

207 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 207 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Railway Claims Tribunal Rejection of Compensation for Untoward Incident. Held that strict proof of boarding train is not required under Section 124-A of Railways Act, 1989 and the claimant's version must be accepted unless rebutted by strong evidence.

The appellant, Nitin Navindas Hundiwala, a 75-year-old consultant, filed a claim for compensation under Section 124-A of the Railways Act, 1989, read ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Incorrect Multiplier and Omission of Future Prospects. Compensation Enhanced from Rs.5,96,761 to Rs.7,26,700 with 9% Interest for Deceased Aged 45 Years Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The present appeal arises from a motor accident claim where the deceased, Smt. Tarawati, aged 45 years, died in a road accident on 07.02.2003 due to r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

SALES TAX REFERENCE NO. 52 OF 2009

The matter came before the Bombay High Court as two sales tax references arising from the assessment of M/s. Radhasons International, a partnership fi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Custody of Seized Truck in Excise Case — Modifies Onerous Condition of Bank Guarantee Under Section 457 CrPC. Truck Owner Not Required to Furnish Bank Guarantee for Full Value; Reasonable Conditions to Be Imposed.

The applicant, Jilani Nasiruddin Gore, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) challenging the order of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in ESI Act Case — Establishes Separate Entities Not Functionally Interconnected. Functional Interconnectivity Test Under Section 75(1)(g) of ESI Act, 1948 Requires Common Supervision, Finance, and Labour; Mere Common Partners Insufficient.

The appellant, M/s. New Power Supply, a partnership concern engaged in manufacturing and repairing power transformers, filed an appeal against the jud...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Adjudicates Batch of Appeals Involving Transit Fee Levied by Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and Madhya Pradesh Under Indian Forest Act, 1927. Appeals Arise from Differing High Court Decisions on Validity of Transit Rules Framed Under Section 41.

The Supreme Court addressed a batch of cases concerning the levy of transit fee on forest produce. The matter involved three States: Uttar Pradesh, Ut...