High Court of Karnataka Considers Constitutional Validity of Forest Development Tax Notification and Demands. Petitioners Challenge vires of Karnataka Forest Act section 98A and Notification under Forest Conservation Act.
3 Dec 2015...
Search Results for "market fee dues"
144 result(s) found
Found 144 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Copyright Royalty Dispute Between Radio Broadcaster and Performance Rights Society. Court holds that interim injunction restraining radio station from broadcasting sound recordings without paying royalties was valid but modifies order to require payment of royalties at rates determined by Copyright Board pending final adjudication.
2 Apr 2013The dispute arose between Phonographic Performance Ltd. (Plaintiff), a performing rights society registered under the Copyright Act, 1957, and Radio O...
- 156
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Arbitration Petition Under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 Challenging Arbitral Award Directing Satisfaction of Mortgage and Reassignment of Property. The Arbitral Award Had Directed the Mortgagor to Reassign Premises and Pay Outstanding Dues, Which the Legal Heirs of the Deceased Petitioner Contested on Various Grounds Including Improper Impleadment of Legal Representatives.
29 Oct 2010The matter arose from an arbitration petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an award dated 1st December,...
- 56
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Department's Appeal in Central Excise Refund Case — Limitation Period Under Section 11B Is Mandatory and Unjust Enrichment Applies to Pre-deposit Refunds. The court held that the one-year limitation for refund claims cannot be extended and the claimant must prove no passing of duty burden.
8 Mar 2024The case involves two connected matters: an appeal by the Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Thane Rural, against an order of the Customs, Excise ...
- 37
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Rejection of Plaint Against Defendant Directors in NSEL Suit for Lack of Averments and Immunity Under IFC Act. The court held that vague allegations without specific averments do not constitute a cause of action, and an IFC employee is immune from suit for official acts under the International Finance Corporation (Status, Immunities and Privileges) Act, 1958.
23 Sep 2015The Bombay High Court disposed of two notices of motion filed by Defendant Nos. 14 and 15 in a suit by National Spot Exchange Limited (NSEL) against v...
- 95
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Writ Petitions Concerning Forest Development Tax on Mining Leases Under Karnataka Forest Act, 1963; Constitutional Validity of Section 98A and Notification Examined. The petitioners contended that the notification dated 16.08.2008 and demand of forest development tax from holders of mining leases in forest areas were repugnant to the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 and ultra vires the State's legislative competence.
3 Dec 2015A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by various entities inc...
- 71
High Court
- 14
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Specific Performance with Exemplary Costs for Suppression of Facts and Forum Shopping. Plaintiffs failed to disclose prior pending suit and obtained ex parte orders by misrepresentation, leading to dismissal and costs of Rs. 5 lakhs.
5 Mar 2018The plaintiffs, Anand Agarwal and Pramila Anand Agarwal, filed a Commercial Suit No. 614 of 2017 before the Bombay High Court seeking specific perform...
- 102
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Sections 35AA and 35AB of Banking Regulation Act, 1949 and RBI Circular on Stressed Assets Resolution. The Court held that the RBI circular dated 12.02.2018 is valid and not arbitrary, and that the requirement of 100% lender consent for restructuring and mandatory IBC reference for large accounts is within RBI's powers.
2 Apr 2019The present batch of petitions and transferred cases challenged the constitutional validity of Sections 35AA and 35AB of the Banking Regulation Act, 1...
- 237
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Contractual Forfeiture Case — HUDCO Cannot Forfeit Payments Without Fulfilling Reciprocal Obligations. Allotment Cancellation and Forfeiture of Rs. 28.11 Crores Set Aside as Unjust Enrichment Where Lessor Failed to Execute Agreement to Sub-Lease.
7 Feb 2025The dispute arose from an allotment letter issued by HUDCO to Tomorrowland Limited for a 99-year lease of land to build a 5-star hotel. The appellant ...
- 834
