Bombay High Court hears Writ Petition concerning land acquisition for Panvel-Virar-Alibaug Multipurpose Corridor project. The petition challenges acquisition proceedings and seeks adequate compensation and rehabilitation.
8 Apr 2025...
Search Results for "malafide transfer"
407 result(s) found
Found 407 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Injunction Against Use of 'RPG' Mark by Defendants in Passing Off and Trade Mark Infringement Suit. The court held that the Defendants' use of 'RPG' as a prominent feature in their trade name was deceptively similar to the Plaintiff's registered marks under the Trade Marks Act, 1999, and likely to cause confusion.
21 Mar 2022The Plaintiff, RPG Enterprises Limited, a multi-industry Indian conglomerate, filed a suit against the Defendants, Riju Ghoshal and Poulami Ghoshal, f...
- 59
High Court
Karnataka High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Tribunal's Dismissal for Default Without Notice. Restoration of Application Ordered on Grounds of Violation of Natural Justice.
21 Jun 2021The petitioner, Vasantkumar, a Special Land Acquisition Officer in KIADB, Dharwad, filed two writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitu...
- 123
High Court
High Court Quashes Transfer Order of BBMP Employee Due to Non-Compliance with Transfer Policy and Lack of Posting Order. Transfer Order Without Specifying Place of Posting is Arbitrary and Illegal.
11 Dec 2019The petitioner, Sri K M Vasu, an Executive Engineer on deputation to Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP), challenged two orders dated 24.10.2019...
- 77
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Transfer Order of Agricultural Officer on Grounds of Malafides and Violation of Transfer Policy. Transfer Order Quashed as It Was Not in Public Interest and Was Motivated to Accommodate Another Officer.
26 Feb 2018The petitioner, Sandeep Dashrath Shirsath, was working as an Agricultural Officer at Panchayat Samiti Paithan, Aurangabad. He was transferred by an or...
- 35
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows MPID Act Appeal for Return of Seized Property to Accused Pending Trial — Property Not Proceeds of Crime Under MPID Act. Court holds that Section 3 of MPID Act does not authorize continued retention of property not linked to deposits, and directs release of vehicle and cash to appellant subject to conditions.
30 Nov 2017The Bombay High Court allowed Criminal Appeal No. 813 of 2016 filed by Suresh Raju Shetty, challenging an order of the Designated Court under the Maha...
- 142
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Transfer of Extension Officer Prior to Completion of Normal Tenure. Transfer Upheld as Administrative Necessity to Fill Vacant Post in Hilly Region Under ICDS Project.
29 Jun 2017The petitioner, Sanjay Shankar Shedge, working as Extension Officer (Statistics) with Raigad Zilla Parishad, challenged his transfer order dated 19-05...
- 95
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Petition Challenging Tribunal's Order Setting Aside Suspension of Senior Officer. Suspension order quashed due to non-application of mind and lack of material, considering officer's imminent retirement.
1 Dec 2014The State of Maharashtra challenged an order of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal dated 13 December 2014, which allowed the Original Application...
- 114
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Court Order for Full Back Wages and Retrenchment Compensation to Workmen in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Company's Claim of Financial Difficulty and Closure Not Sufficient to Deny Workmen's Entitlement Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.
31 Mar 2006The petitioner, D.G.P.Windsor (India) Ltd., challenged an order dated 22nd September 2005 passed by the Industrial Court, Thane in Complaint (ULP) No....
- 186
High Court
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Partition Suit — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. Co-owner Cannot Claim Adverse Possession Against Another Co-owner Without Ouster.
30 Nov -0001The case involves a family dispute over property among siblings. The appellants, who are co-owners of the suit property, filed a suit for partition an...
- 160
