Search Results for "lump sum deduction"

169 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 169 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO.4520 OF 2014

The writ petitions challenged the constitutional validity and propriety of a notification dated January 29, 2014, issued by the Finance Department of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Motor Accident Injury Claim — Tribunal's Award of Rs.15 Lakhs Enhanced to Rs.27 Lakhs for 70% Disabled Mechanical Engineer. Loss of Earning Capacity Reassessed with 50% Future Prospects and Multiplier of 14 Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellant, Pratap Dandapani Padhi, a 43-year-old Mechanical Engineer working as a Foreman at Sunflag Iron & Steel Company Limited with a monthly s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Independent Application of Mind by AO. Reassessment based on borrowed satisfaction from investigation wing without forming own belief is invalid.

The petitioner, Skoda Auto Volkswagen India Private Limited, challenged a notice dated 23rd March 2011 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Whether Lift Installation Contracts Are 'Works Contract' or 'Sale of Goods' for Sales Tax Purposes. The Matter Was Referred to a Larger Bench to Resolve Conflict Between Prior Rulings and to Determine the Applicability of the Predominant Intention Test After Recent Judgments.

The matter stems from multiple writ petitions and civil appeals challenging the classification of contracts for manufacture, supply and installation o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Partially Allows Petition in Industrial Dispute Case — Compensation Enhanced from Rs.50,000 to Rs.1,00,000 per Employee. Labour Court's award under Section 11A of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 modified as compensation was inadequate for terminated employees of merged municipality.

The petitioners, three employees of Vejalpur Nagarpalika, were appointed as Rojamdar Employees in 2003 and later worked as Assistant Clerks from 2009....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Recovery Certificate in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Compromise Terms Binding on Liquidator. Recovery Certificate for Rs.4,44,216/- upheld as compromise was validly entered into and not challenged.

The Petitioner, Adarsh Janata Sahakari Bank Ltd. and its Liquidator, challenged an order dated 16 October 1998 passed by the Industrial Court, Mumbai,...