Search Results for "infructuous relief"

742 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 742 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Interim Order in Transfer Dispute. Workman's Compliance with Transfer Order Renders Complaint Infructuous; Interim Relief Set Aside.

The petitioner, M/s NRB Bearings Limited, challenged an order dated 08/07/2015 passed by the Industrial Court, Jalna, in Complaint (ULP) No.56/2015. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Labour Court Compensation Award as Infructuous — Workman's Legal Heirs Withdrew Deposited Amount. Industrial Dispute Compensation of Rs.50,000/- Already Paid, Petition Becomes Moot.

The petitioner, Chief Executive Officer of Zilla Parishad, Jalgaon, challenged the judgment and award dated 2.8.1993 passed by the Labour Court, Jalga...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Condonation of 381 Days' Delay in Filing Appeal Against Divorce Decree — Wife's Ignorance of Ex-Parte Decree Constitutes Sufficient Cause. Delay condoned as wife was unaware of the decree and learned of it only during DV Act proceedings, and no prejudice caused to husband.

The present Civil Application was filed by the applicant-wife seeking condonation of 381 days' delay in filing the Family Court Appeal against the jud...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Against DRT Order in Debt Recovery Case — Bank Entitled to Recover Debt Under RDB Act. DRT Has Inherent Power to Reject Frivolous Counterclaim Without Recording Evidence, and High Court Should Not Interfere When Alternative Remedy of Appeal Exists.

The case involves two writ petitions arising from proceedings before the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) under the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Fin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Applicant's Claim for Compensation in Arbitration Proceedings Due to Lack of Jurisdiction Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Designate Judge under Section 11 cannot award compensation for alleged delay in arbitration; remedy lies elsewhere.

The applicant, Shailesh H. Kulkarni, filed a Misc. Civil Application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking directions...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Interim Application Seeking Section 340 CrPC Proceedings in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute for Alleged Fabrication of MHADA Affidavit. Court Finds Affidavit Was Authentic, E-filed Under Administrative Directions, and Served on All Parties, Negating Claim of Fraud on Court.

The case involved two writ petitions challenging a slum rehabilitation scheme on MHADA land in Bandra East, Mumbai. The petitioners claimed to be MHAD...