Search Results for "income-tax"

187 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 187 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Fresh Material. Assessment Reopened Beyond Four Years Without Allegation of Failure to Disclose Material Facts Held Invalid.

The petitioner, Talati & Panthaky Associated Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a notice date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction Against Alienation of Property in Will Dispute Between Son and Father. Son, as sole beneficiary under mother's will, entitled to interim protection of estate pending administration.

The plaintiff, Uday Narendra Shah, filed a suit seeking administration of the estate of his deceased mother, Jayamati Narendra Shah, who died on 10 Ju...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Interim Application in Development Agreement Dispute — Prima Facie Case Not Made Out as Agreement Was Terminated for Non-Performance. Specific Performance Claim Requires Trial; No Irreparable Loss Shown.

The Plaintiffs, Shantilal J. Shah and others, filed a suit seeking a declaration that a Development Agreement dated 25th September 2007 and an Irrevoc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Income Tax Case — Section 249(4) of Income Tax Act, 1961, is Directory, Not Mandatory. Non-Payment of Self-Assessment Tax at Time of Filing Appeal Does Not Bar Appeal if Tax Paid Before Hearing.

The case involves an appeal by Shri Bharatkumar Sakhsaria against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 31-10-2001, which held his appe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Reopening of Assessment in Income Tax Case Due to Lack of Fresh Material. Notice under Section 148 issued beyond four years quashed as there was no failure to disclose material facts and the reasons constituted a change of opinion.

The petitioner, Anil Radhakrishna Wani, a solicitor and advocate, was a partner of Little & Company and retired on 30 September 2002. Upon retirement,...