Search Results for "immoral traffic prevention"

132 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 132 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Non-Communication of Right to Representation and Mechanical Confirmation. Detenu's Right to Make Representation Under Section 8 of Karnataka Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1985 Was Not Communicated, Rendering Detention Illegal.

The writ petition was filed by Smt. Prathiba Talapati, wife of the detenu Sri. Dawood Nadaf, challenging the preventive detention order dated 03.06.20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Essential Commodities Act Case Due to Invalid Investigation by Assistant Commissioner of Police. Investigation by officer not of rank of Deputy Superintendent of Police violates Section 6A of Essential Commodities Act, 1955, leading to quashing of FIR and proceedings.

The petitioners, Sarvesh Kumar Shahi and Samiresh Kumar, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the initiation of proceedings ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order in Telangana Case -- Daughter's Appeal Succeeds on Grounds of Insufficient Material for Public Order Threat

The Supreme Court allowed an appeal challenging the preventive detention order against Aruna Bai alias Anguri Bai under the Telangana Prevention of Da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Detention Under MPDA Act — Preventive Detention Upheld as Legally Valid. Court holds that subjective satisfaction of detaining authority based on credible material is sufficient and not vitiated by delay in disposal of representation.

The case involves a criminal writ petition filed by 23 petitioners challenging their detention under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activitie...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Writ Appeals by Aggregators and Bike Taxi Owners Against State’s Refusal to Grant Permits for Bike Taxi Services. Dispute Centers on Whether Motorcycle Owners Are Entitled to Render Bike Taxi Services Under the Motor Vehicles Act and Karnataka Rules.

The case comprised five writ appeals filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961, challenging a common order dated 02.04.2025 passed b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of Criminal Proceedings in Outraging Modesty Case Due to Compromise. The court held that inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC can be exercised to quash non-compoundable offences if the dispute is private and parties have settled, to secure the ends of justice.

The applicants, seven individuals including Abdul Sattar Mahetab Khoriwale and others, were original accused in Crime No. 278/2010 registered at Shiva...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Police Harassment of Beautician — Violation of Right to Practice Profession Under Article 19(1)(g). Police officials directed to permit petitioner to carry on her beauty parlor business without interference and to pay costs of Rs. 25,000.

The petitioner, Shakuntala Karamveer Sarsath, a beautician by occupation, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India allegin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under PASA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Procedural Lapses. Detenu's Preventive Detention Set Aside as Subjective Satisfaction Was Not Properly Recorded and Grounds of Detention Were Not Communicated in Time.

The petitioner, Nitin Bhimabhai Patel, was detained under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act, 1985 (PASA Act) by orders dated 14/03/...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision, Discharges Applicant in PITA Case for Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Knowledge of Brothel Use. Applicant's flat was let out on leave and license basis; no material to show applicant knew premises were used as a brothel.

The applicant, Mahesh Panjabrao Andhale, filed a Criminal Revision Application before the Bombay High Court challenging the order dated 09/02/2021 pas...