Search Results for "hymen intact"

120 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 120 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Appeal Against Conviction Under POCSO Act and IPC for Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault and Kidnapping. Trial Court Had Imposed 20 Years Rigorous Imprisonment for Offences Against a Minor.

The appellant, original accused no.1, was convicted in Special (POCSO) Case No.94/2017 by the Extra Joint District Judge and Additional Sessions Judge...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Penetrative Sexual Assault Allegation Fails as Victim's Statements to Doctor and Magistrate Did Not Mention Digital Penetration, and Material Evidence Like Knickers Was Not Produced.

The appellant, Chatur @ Chetan Maroti Meshram, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Gadchiroli, for offences under Section 376-AB IPC and S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Doubtful Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 5(m) punishable under Section 6 of POCSO Act and Section 376(2)(i) IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove identity of perpetrator beyond reasonable doubt.

The case involves an appeal against the conviction of Anil Chhotelal Chhevle under Section 5(m) punishable under Section 6 of the Protection of Childr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Father-Daughter Rape Case: POCSO Act Overrides IPC for Offence but Greater Punishment Applies Under Section 42. The Court held that Section 42 of POCSO Act mandates application of law providing greater punishment, and High Court cannot enhance sentence without appeal.

The appellant, Gyanendra Singh @ Raja Singh, was convicted by the trial court for offences under Sections 376(2)(f) and 376(2)(i) of the Indian Penal ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Age of Victim. Conviction under Section 376 IPC and Section 4 of POCSO Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Victim's Age Below 18 Years and Relied on Contradictory Testimony.

The appellant, Asif s/o Jakir Pathan, was convicted by the Special Judge/Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad in Special Case (POCSO) No.173 of 2016 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Convict in Rape of Minor Case — Victim's Testimony Found Credible. Conviction under Section 376(2)(i) IPC and Section 6 POCSO Act upheld as medical evidence and prompt FIR corroborate victim's account.

The appellant, Ganesh Laxman Madne, was convicted by the Special Judge and Additional Sessions Judge, Yavatmal, in Special Case No.44/2015 for offence...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Acquits Appellant in Rape and Abetment of Suicide Case Due to Inconsistent Dying Declarations. Conviction under Sections 366(A), 376, 306, 506 IPC set aside as dying declarations were contradictory and not corroborated by medical evidence.

The appellant, Madhukar Baswant Barora, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Kalyan on 3rd July 2012 for offences under Sections 366(A), 37...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Attempt to Rape of Minor Girl — Life Imprisonment Confirmed. Circumstantial Evidence Including Last Seen Theory and Recovery of Incriminating Articles Sufficient to Prove Guilt Under Section 302 and Section 376 read with Section 511 IPC.

The appellant, Vasant Jaiwant Palande, was convicted by the Sessions Court for the murder of a 15-year-old girl (Chhoti @ Sujata @ Sulochana) and for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Sentence for Rape of 5-Year-Old Girl. Conviction under Section 376(2)(f) IPC Sustained Based on Direct Eyewitness Testimony and Medical Evidence.

The appellant, Amir Nyamatkha Tadvi, was convicted by the 3rd Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Jalgaon, for the offence of rape under Section 376(2)(...