Search Results for "erroneous and prejudicial"

186 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 186 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in SARFAESI Act Case — Plaint Rejection Upheld for Lack of Civil Court Jurisdiction. Dispute over mortgaged properties held to be exclusively triable by DRT under Section 34 of SARFAESI Act, 2002.

The case involves two appeals arising from a suit filed by Pooja Ravikumar Nidasoshi and Vandana (plaintiffs) against the Gadhinglaj Urban Co-operativ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Seniority Dispute, Quashing High Court Division Bench Judgment. Seniority lists prepared based on date of dispatch of select lists were held arbitrary and contrary to Rule 5 of Uttar Pradesh Government Servants Seniority Rules, 1991, requiring fresh merit-based list.

The dispute arose from seniority lists dated 05.09.2006 and 05.03.2010 for Junior Engineers in the Department of Minor Irrigation, Uttar Pradesh, invo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in IBC Section 7 Case — NCLT Cannot Dismiss Petition Without Applying Mind to Merits. Adjudicating Authority Must Determine Default and Admit or Reject Petition Under Section 7, Not Direct Settlement Without Considering Individual Claims.

The present appeal under Section 62 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) arises from a judgment of the National Company Law Appellate Tri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by MOIL Limited Against Revision Under Section 263 for CSR Claim. Commissioner Justified in Remanding CSR Expenditure for Proper Inquiry as Assessment Order Was Erroneous and Prejudicial to Revenue.

The appellant-assessee, MOIL Limited (formerly Manganese Ore India Limited), a public sector undertaking wholly owned by the Government of India, is e...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed Under Section 100 CPC. Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Injunction Dismissed as Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Adverse Possession.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original plaintiffs (appellants) against the judgment and decree of the 7th Additional District Judge, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order Under Section 57 of Bombay Police Act, 1950 for Non-Application of Mind. Court holds that mere registration of criminal cases without evidence of continuous harmful activity does not justify externment.

The petitioner, Anil Chabildas Choudhary, an active member of the Rashtravadi Congress Party (NCP) in Bhusawal Municipal Council, challenged the exter...