Search Results for "employer liability"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "employer liability"

945 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 945 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Compensation Award to Injured Driver in Motor Accident Claim — Employer's Liability Affirmed Despite Insurance Policy Lapse. The Court held that the employer is liable to pay compensation under the Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 for injuries sustained by a driver in the course of employment, and the insurance company is not liable due to policy lapse.

15 Apr 2026

The present First Appeal was filed by The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. under Section 30 of the Employee's Compensation Act, 1923, impugning the Judgme...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Employer's Appeal in Employee Compensation Case — Injury After Work Hours Not in Course of Employment. The court held that an accident occurring after the workman had left the workplace and outside working hours does not arise out of and in the course of employment under Section 3 of the Employee's Compensation Act, 1923, reversing the Commissioner's award.

12 Dec 2025

The appellant, Ganesha, proprietor of Ganesha Engineering Works, challenged the judgment and award dated 29.11.2021 passed by the Senior Civil Judge a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Zilla Parishad in Motor Accident Compensation Case — Sets Aside Tribunal's Award Due to Lack of Vicarious Liability. Employer Not Liable for Accident Caused by Employee While Driving Personal Vehicle Without Employer's Knowledge or Permission Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

27 Jul 2023

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the legal heirs of Rafik Khalifa (deceased) who died in a road accident on 18th August 2016. The ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Compensation Award in Workmen's Compensation Case — Insurer Liable Jointly and Severally with Employer for Employee's Injuries. Employer's Failure to Deposit Compensation Attracts Penalty Under Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.

3 Jan 2020

The case involves an appeal by National Insurance Co. Ltd. against a judgment of the learned Commissioner under Workmen's Compensation and Judge, Elev...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Workmen Compensation Case — Employer-Employee Relationship Established. Deceased Driver's Employment Under Owner Proved by Oral and Documentary Evidence, Including Driving License and Insurance Policy, Under Section 30(1) of Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.

28 Aug 2019

The appellant, United India Insurance Co. Ltd., filed a Miscellaneous First Appeal under Section 30(1) of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, agains...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Assistant Labour Commissioner's Order Declaring Five Workmen as Protected Workmen — Trade Union Must Be Registered Under Trade Unions Act, 1926 to Claim Protection Under Section 33 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The court held that an unregistered trade union cannot seek declaration of its office bearers as protected workmen under Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

5 Nov 2018

The petitioner, M/s. Wonderla Holidays Limited, a public limited company running amusement parks, challenged an order dated 16.09.2017 passed by the A...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Employer's Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Employer Liable for Compensation Despite Insurance Exoneration. Employer failed to establish breach of policy conditions; Commissioner's award of compensation and penalty upheld under Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.

2 Jul 2015

The case involves a first appeal filed by the employer, Balaji Constructions, challenging the judgment and order of the Commissioner appointed under t...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Appeal by Goa Tourism Development Corporation Ltd. Against Provident Fund Commissioner's Order — Contractors' Employees Held Entitled to Provident Fund Benefits Under Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952. Principal Employer Cannot Escape Liability for Provident Fund Contributions of Contractor's Employees Under Section 2(f) of EPF Act.

25 Mar 2015

The appellant, Goa Tourism Development Corporation Ltd., a government corporation registered under the Companies Act, 1956, engaged in promoting touri...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case for Driver with Fracture Injuries. Commissioner's Assessment of Monthly Wages and Disablement Found Erroneous Due to Lack of Rebuttal Evidence.

24 Jun 2014

The appeal was filed by the original claimant against the judgment and order of the Labour Court, Ahmednagar (Commissioner under the Workmen's Compens...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Labour Court Orders Under Section 33C(2) Industrial Disputes Act. Employer-Employee Relationship Must Be Established Before Invoking Section 33C(2) and Cannot Be Decided as Incidental Issue.

19 Jan 2005

The judgment involves two writ petitions challenging orders of the Labour Court under Section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The petitio...

7 8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)