Search Results for "drain construction"

121 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 121 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Public Interest Litigation Seeking Directions for Mosquito Control and Sanitation Across Tamil Nadu. Vague Pleadings and Lack of Specific Evidence Fail to Establish Grounds for Issuing Mandamus Under Article 226, Despite Right to Health Under Article 21 and Duties Under Article 51A.

The writ petition was filed as a public interest litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a mandamus directing the Principal ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against Storm Water Drain Construction Due to Title Dispute; Directs Civil Court Remedy. Court Holds that Disputed Questions of Title Cannot Be Resolved Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Requiring a Trial by Competent Civil Court.

The petitioners, joint owners of a business premises, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Storm Water Drain Construction on Private Land. Court Holds That Disputed Questions of Title Cannot Be Adjudicated in Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 of the Constitution.

The petitioners, S.Ramesh and S.Anand, joint owners of business premises in Vadaperumbakkam Village, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Official Liquidator's Report in Winding Up of Transpower Engineering Ltd. — Holds Sale by Liquidator is Formal Transfer Not Subject to Differential Premium. Court exercises powers under Section 446(2) of Companies Act, 1956 to waive extension charges claimed by MIDC.

The Official Liquidator filed a report seeking directions regarding the sale of two industrial plots allotted by MIDC to Transpower Engineering Ltd. (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Reference Court Erred in Rejecting Claim Without Considering Evidence. Enhancement of Compensation Granted Based on Comparable Sale Instances Under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The appellant, Luis Alex Cardozo, owned land in Margao, Goa, which was acquired by the respondents (Deputy Collector and Executive Engineer) for the c...