Search Results for "distinct commercial goods"

586 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 586 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Levy of Fees on Transporters and Traders Under Essential Commodities Act for Maintenance of Public Distribution System. The court held that the levy under Section 3(3)(f) of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 is a valid regulatory fee and not a tax.

The judgment involves multiple writ petitions and civil applications challenging the levy of fees on transporters and traders under the Maharashtra Es...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Writ Appeals Filed by Tea and Coffee Plantation Companies Against Denial of Input Tax Credit on Cultivation Inputs under Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003. Issue: Whether Cultivation Inputs Eligible for Tax Credit Under Section 10(2) Read with Section 2(6) and 2(19) of the Act.

The appeals arose from reassessment orders passed under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, denying input tax credit to tea and coffee plantation...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Reassessment Orders Against Corporate Dealers in KVAT Cases; Holds Inter-Branch Transfers Not Taxable as Sale. Branch Registration Under Section 38(6) Does Not Create Separate Legal Personality for Levy of VAT.

The batch of writ petitions was filed by corporate entities, including M/s Wipro Enterprises (P) Ltd and M/s Chamundeshwari Build Tech Pvt. Ltd, chall...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Adjudicates Classification of Electrical Insulated Press Board Under Third Schedule of KVAT Act, 2003. Assessee's Claim for Lower Tax Rate as 'Paper' is Examined Under Common Parlance and Trade Parlance Tests.

The assessee, a registered dealer under the CST Act and KVAT Act, manufactured and sold Electrical Insulated Press Board (High Density Board) used in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction to Plaintiff in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Case. The court restrained the defendant from using deceptively similar 'PRINCE' and crown device marks for PVC pipes, finding a strong prima facie case of infringement and passing off.

The plaintiff, Prince Pipes and Fittings Ltd., a Mumbai-based company, has been using the mark 'PRINCE' and a 'crown device' since 1987 for manufactur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Whether Bunker Fuel Sales to Vessels on High Seas Are Taxable Under Maharashtra VAT Act. Petitioners Challenged Assessment Orders and Recovery Notices Claiming Sales Occurred Outside State Territory and Were in Course of Export.

The dispute arose from assessment and recovery proceedings under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 concerning sales of High Speed Diesel (HSD)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Extended Period Demand Under Section 11A of Central Excise Act — Suppression of Facts Justifies Extended Limitation. Forgings Classified Under Chapter 84 as Machinery Parts, Not Eligible for Exemption Under Notification No.223/88.

The Bombay High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by M/s Rajkumar Forge Limited and its director challenging orders of the Commissioner of Central...