Search Results for "demand and acceptance"

1875 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1875 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Peon in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Demand for Rs.300 for Certified Copies Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Raju Shantaram Kakphale, a peon in the Thane District Court, was convicted by the Special Judge, Thane, for offences under Sections 7 a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Prakash Harishchandra Mandalik, was convicted by the Special Judge, Pune, under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Complainant and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Rajendra Suryakant Kapile, was a Senior Clerk in the Sub-Regional Provident Fund Office, CIDCO, Aurangabad. The complainant, Dharamchan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Bribery Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Anil Meshram, a BSNL employee, was convicted by the Special Judge, Gadchiroli for demanding and accepting a bribe of Rs. 1,500 from com...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Police Officer in Corruption Case Due to Invalid Sanction and Unreliable Evidence. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 29th January 2010 passed by the learned Special Judge, Greater Bombay in ACB Sp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand and Acceptance. Conviction under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to establish demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The judgment pertains to two criminal appeals filed by Pandurang Raghunath Dhimte (original accused no.1) and Balasaheb Vasant Godse (original accused...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in CBI Corruption Case Due to Lack of Evidence. Conviction under Prevention of Corruption Act and IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The judgment pertains to two criminal appeals filed by accused persons convicted by the Special Judge for CBI Cases, Bangalore, in Spl.C.C.No.139 of 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case — Demand and Acceptance Not Proved. Sanction Held Invalid Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of the respondent (accused), a Forest Guard, in Special Criminal Case No.1/2008 by the Additio...