Search Results for "daughter's equal share"

328 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 328 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Daughter's Right to Partition in Scheduled Tribe Family Based on Custom — Custom of Succession Among Bhil Tribe Recognized as Entitling Daughter to Father's Share

The case involves a second appeal by the original defendants (Bhagga Damma Bhil and Shama Bhagga Bhil) against the judgment of the District Judge, Dhu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Application to Set Aside Ex-Parte Decree in Suit for Declaration and Injunction. Delay of 13 Years Not Condoned as Applicants Failed to Show Sufficient Cause Under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC.

The case involves a civil revision application filed by the original defendants (applicants) against an order of the Civil Judge Senior Division, Khed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Letters of Administration Due to Lack of Jurisdiction and Non-Compliance with Probate Requirements. Petitioner failed to establish that the deceased was domiciled in India and that the will was validly executed under Indian law.

The petitioner, Hameed Jaffar Ahmed Ibrahim Mandeel, filed a Miscellaneous Petition under the Testamentary and Intestate Jurisdiction of the Bombay Hi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Succession Act Case — Will Proved in Manner Required by Law. Court holds that a will executed by a Muslim testator is governed by the Indian Succession Act, 1925, and must be proved in accordance with Section 63(c) and Section 68 of the Evidence Act, 1872.

The case involves a first appeal against the judgment and decree of the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Aurangabad, in Special Civil Suit No. 5 of 2000,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals in Property Suit, Upholds Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. Court holds that a co-owner cannot claim adverse possession against another co-owner unless there is clear ouster and hostile title asserted.

The case involves a property dispute between two brothers, Gurudayalsing Bindra (original defendant, now represented by his legal representatives as a...