Search Results for "criminal trial standard"

1836 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1836 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Kidnapping and Rape of Minor Girl. Consistent Testimony of Prosecutrix and Medical Evidence of Pregnancy Confirm Offences Under Sections 363, 366-A, and 376 IPC.

The appellant, Ravindra @ Balu s/o Sonaji Hivrale, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, for offences under Sections 363, 366-A,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Consensual Relationship and Lack of Evidence of Promise to Marry. Conviction under Section 376(2)(i)(n) IPC and POCSO Act set aside as prosecutrix was a consenting minor and no false promise of marriage established.

The appellant, Prashant Ramchandra Kasarkar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge-3, Yavatmal in Special (POCSO) Case 63/2017 for offences u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Delivers Judgment on Death Sentence Confirmation in POCSO Case Involving Sexual Assault of Three Minor Girls. The Court Considers Reliability of Minor Victims’ Testimony, Delay in FIR, and Definition of Penetrative Sexual Assault Under POCSO Act.

The High Court of Madras (Madurai Bench) delivered a common judgment in a referred trial (RT(MD) No.4 of 2026) for confirmation of death sentence and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Default Bail to Accused in Murder Case Due to Non-Completion of Investigation Within 90 Days. Right to Default Bail Under Section 167(2) CrPC Not Defeated by Subsequent Filing of Charge Sheet.

The petitioners, Dattatraya Ankush Pathade and Sonali Satish Wakade, were arrested in connection with Crime No.416 of 2020 registered at Shrigonda Pol...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Rape of Minor in Absence of Direct Evidence of Penetration. Circumstantial Evidence and Medical Report Sufficient to Prove Guilt Under Section 376(2)(f) IPC.

The appellant, Deepak Shankarrao Borkar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha, in Special Case No. 7 of 2012 for offences under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Commutes Death Sentence to Life Imprisonment in Rape and Murder of Minor. Conviction Upheld but Death Penalty Not Warranted Due to Lack of Aggravating Circumstances.

The appellant, Ravishankar @ Baba Vishwakarma, was convicted by the Trial Court for kidnapping, raping, and murdering a 13-year-old girl, and for dest...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Restores Conviction for Dishonour of Cheque. Complainant's Financial Capacity to Advance Loan and Legally Enforceable Debt Established, Reversing Acquittal by Sessions Court.

The appellant, Krishna Gopal Khetan, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the judgment of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Sampling Procedure. Failure to Follow Section 11 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 and Rule 14 of PFA Rules Renders Conviction Unsustainable.

The petitioner, Sri. Syed Ahammed, was the accused in Criminal Case No.1022/2008 before the Civil Judge and JMFC, Sakaleshpura, for an offence under t...