Search Results for "consignee"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "consignee"

145 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 145 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Winding Up Petition Under Section 433(e) of Companies Act, 1956 — Bona Fide Defence of No Privity of Contract Rejected Based on Admission of Debt. The court held that an admission of debt by the Respondent, coupled with failure to reply to the Appellant's letter, negated the defence of no privity of contract.

2 Aug 2012

The appeal arose from an order of the Learned Company Judge dated 11 February 2011 dismissing a Petition for winding up under Section 433(e) of the Co...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge by CFS Operators to Customs Public Notices. Petition Under Article 226 Seeks Quashing of Notices Allegedly Imposing Unlawful Restrictions on Container Freight Stations.

5 Jun 2017

The petitioners, comprising thirteen Container Freight Station (CFS) operators and thirteen individual directors, filed a writ petition under Article ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Validity of Supplementary Charge Sheet Under Section 173(8) CrPC After Judicial Discharge of Accused in Property Forgery Matter. The core issue is whether prosecution can file a supplementary charge sheet resurrecting a discharged accused, circumventing the provisions of Section 319 CrPC.

5 Jul 2024

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Charterparty Dispute — Upholds Award of Demurrage and Rejection of Oral Joint Venture Agreement. The court held that the arbitral tribunal's findings were not patently illegal or against public policy under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

30 Jan 2019

The case involves an arbitration petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award passed in disp...

High Court

Madras High Court Decides Writ Petition Against Blacklisting Order by Tamil Nadu Medical Services Corporation; Verdict Not Available in Extract

25 Feb 2025

The writ petition was filed by P.K.R.Thangamani, the sole proprietor of M/s Reliance Instruments Corporation, against two respondents: the Secretary t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Suit for Recovery of Price of Goods Supplied Under Contract with State Government — Interest Awarded at 6% per annum from Date of Suit. Plaintiff proved supply of pesticides and defendant's failure to pay balance price.

24 Mar 2006

The plaintiff, M/s. Devidayal Sales Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit against the State of Maharashtra for recovery of Rs. 2,56,560/- with interest. The plainti...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeals in Central Sales Tax Case — No Time Limit for Delivery Under Section 6(2) of CST Act. Circulars Imposing Timeframe for Taking Delivery from Carrier Quashed as Ultra Vires.

27 Apr 2020

The Supreme Court dealt with four civil appeals involving a common question of law under Sections 3 and 6 of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 (CST Act)...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused No.1 in NDPS Act Case for Charas Possession, Confirms Acquittal of Co-Accused for Lack of Conspiracy Evidence. Conviction under Section 20(b) NDPS Act sustained based on recovery of 46 cartons of charas concealed in leather jackets, while acquittal under Section 29 upheld due to absence of proof of conspiracy.

9 Mar 2011

The case involves two appeals arising from a common judgment of the Special Judge under the NDPS Act in Special Case Nos.363 of 1998 and 279 of 1999. ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Telecom Dispute Over Quantum Meruit Claim Under Section 70 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 — Contractual Relationship Bars Quantum Meruit Recovery. The Court held that where parties are governed by an express contract, a claim under Section 70 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 is not permissible, as the section applies only in the absence of a contractual relationship.

27 Feb 2019

The appeal arose from a dispute under the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997, between Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. (appellant) and Tata...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Charter Party Dispute — Upholds Award of Rs.52,54,046.34 with Costs. Court holds that findings of fact by the arbitral tribunal on breach of charter party and quantum of damages are not open to challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

12 Mar 2014

The appellant, SKS Logistics Ltd, owned a vessel named M.V. Royal Pisces. By a fixture note dated 22nd June 2007, the appellant gave the vessel on hir...

7 8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)