Madras High Court Decides Writ Petition Against Blacklisting Order by Tamil Nadu Medical Services Corporation; Verdict Not Available in Extract

High Court: Madras High Court Bench: Principal
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The writ petition was filed by P.K.R.Thangamani, the sole proprietor of M/s Reliance Instruments Corporation, against two respondents: the Secretary to Government, Health and Family Welfare, Government of Tamil Nadu (first respondent) and the Tamil Nadu Medical Services Corporation Limited (TNMSC) (second respondent). The petitioner had a long-standing contractual relationship with TNMSC, having successfully executed several tenders for supplying and installing medical equipment in various government hospitals. The dispute arose from three tenders floated by the second respondent: (i) tender dated 01.02.2021 for fixing rate contract for supply and installation of CSSD and laundry equipment; (ii) tender dated 14.12.2021 for supply and installation of gauze cutting machine, endoscopic cleaning and disinfection machine, plasma sterilizer, and drying cabinet; and (iii) tender dated 04.08.2022 for supply and installation of autoclave vertical units. The petitioner received letters of acceptance for these tenders. However, by orders dated 02.08.2024 and 28.08.2024, the second respondent blacklisted the petitioner for a period of two years, prohibiting him from participating in any further tenders. The petitioner contended that the blacklisting orders were passed arbitrarily, illegally, and unreasonably, without proper justification or adherence to principles of natural justice, thereby violating his fundamental right to carry on business under Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution. Invoking the writ jurisdiction under Article 226, the petitioner sought a writ of certiorarified mandamus to quash the impugned orders and a consequent direction to the respondents to permit his firm to take part in all future tenders. The matter was heard and reserved on 24.01.2025. The complete reasoning and final decision of the court are not available in the extracted text.

Issue of Consideration

Whether the blacklisting orders passed by the second respondent are arbitrary, illegal, and unreasonable, and whether certiorarified mandamus should issue

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (MAD) (02) 148

W.P.No.34374 of 2024 and WMP.Nos.37248, 37250, and 37251 of 2024

2025-02-25

S.SOUNTHAR

2025:MHC:563

Mr.P.H.Arvind Pandian, Senior Advocate for M/s.Vikram Veerasamy; Mr.E.Sundaram, Government Advocate for R1; Mr.UM.Shivakumar, Standing Counsel for R2

P.K.R.Thangamani, Sole Proprietor of M/s.Reliance Instruments Corporation

1. The Secretary to Government, Health and Family Welfare, Government of Tamil Nadu; 2. Tamil Nadu Medical Services Corporation Limited, represented by its Managing Director

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging administrative blacklisting order

Remedy Sought

To quash the impugned blacklisting orders and to direct the respondents to permit the petitioner to participate in all future tenders

Filing Reason

The second respondent blacklisted the petitioner for a period of two years from participating in its tenders

Issues

Whether the blacklisting orders passed by the second respondent are arbitrary, illegal, and unreasonable

Judgment Excerpts

The writ petition is filed challenging the order passed by the 2nd respondent, blacklisting the petitioner for a period of two years from participating in the tenders floated by the 2nd respondent.

Procedural History

The petitioner, having been blacklisted by the second respondent's orders dated 02.08.2024 and 28.08.2024, filed the instant writ petition seeking judicial review under Article 226.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India, 1950: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Bride Burning Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Inconsistencies. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Homicidal Death Beyond Reasonable Doubt.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim for Permanent Disability and Loss of Income. The court enhanced compensation from Rs.1,10,000 to Rs.5,14,735 for injuries sustained in a head-on collision between a bus and a truck.