Search Results for "confiscation"

312 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 312 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"State of Maharashtra v. Deepak Buradkar: A Clash of Law, Ownership, and Justice" Balancing rights, procedural rigor, and allegations of malice in timber trade.

This case deals with a legal battle over the confiscation of timber logs, allegations of unauthorized transportation, malicious prosecution, and the e...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Confiscation of Souza and Padamsee Artworks as Obscene — Customs Officer's Personal Opinion Insufficient to Brand Art as Obscene Under Section 11 Customs Act, 1962. Artistic merit and community standards must be considered before declaring artworks obscene.

The petitioner, M/s. B. K. Polimex India Private Limited, imported seven artworks by world-renowned artists F.N. Souza and Akbar Padamsee from London ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Customs Confiscation Order for Used Haemodialysis Machines — Import Not Prohibited Under Hazardous Waste Rules. Used Medical Equipment Not Classifiable as 'Hazardous Waste' or 'Waste' Under Hazardous and Other Wastes (Management, Handling and Trans-Boundary Movement) Rules, 2016.

The petitioner, Hemant Surgical Industries Limited, is engaged in importing, manufacturing, and supplying medical equipment. Since 2008, it has import...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Customs Appeal, Upholds Confiscation of Cosmetics Imported Through Non-Notified Port. Import of Cosmetics Through Marmagoa Port Violates Rule 133 Read with Rule 43-A of Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945, as Cosmetics Are Not Exempted Under Rule 132 and Schedule D.

The Commissioner of Customs, Goa, filed an appeal under the Customs Act, 1962, against an order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case Regarding Redemption Fine as Business Expenditure. Redemption fine of Rs. 75,00,000 paid for unauthorized import of almonds held allowable as business expenditure under Section 37 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The appeal was filed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which allowed the asses...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Confiscation Order in Forest Offence Case — Petitioner's Wood Seized Without Proper Notice Under Section 61A of Indian Forest Act, 1927. Confiscation Proceedings Initiated Without Affording Opportunity of Hearing Violates Principles of Natural Justice.

The petitioner, Namdeo Narayan Dekate, filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, seeking quashing of an order dated 1...