Search Results for "charge-sheet extension"

147 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 147 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Supervisor by Maharashtra State Electricity Board. Supervisor drawing wages above Rs. 1600 per month is not a workman under Section 2(s) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, hence termination valid.

The petitioner, Vasant Raghunath Tupekar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, Aurangaba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Appeal Against Conviction Under Section 120B r/w 302 IPC. Conviction Stemmed from Alleged Conspiracy to Murder Inder Bhatija by Accused No.1 and Others.

The appeal arose from the conviction and sentence of accused No.1 Pappu @ Suresh Budharmal Kalani by the Additional Sessions Judge, Kalyan in Sessions...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Externment Order in Maharashtra Police Act Case Due to Procedural Lapses and Lack of Evidence. Externment Order Under Section 56(1)(a)(b) of Maharashtra Police Act, 1951 Found Legally Unsustainable as Based on Vague Allegations and Pending Criminal Cases Challenged as Malicious.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court, which dismissed a criminal writ petition challenging an externment orde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reserves Judgment on Challenge to DRI's Investigation and Letters Rogatory in Coal Import Over-Valuation Case. Petitioner Argues Non-Cognizable Offences Require Magistrate Order under CrPC, Rendering Letters Rogatory Invalid.

The present writ petition before the Bombay High Court arises from an investigation initiated by the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) against...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Acquits Appellants in Criminal Appeal. Conviction Under Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Goa Children's Act, 2003 Set Aside Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Property Dispute

The Appellants, were convicted by the Children's Court for offences under Section 504 and 324 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR in Family Dispute Case — Criminal Proceedings Abuse of Process. Court holds that private complaint between family members over property disputes does not disclose criminal offences under Sections 504, 506, 416, 419, 420, 34 IPC.

The petitioners, Smt. Thara Peethambaram (mother) and Dr. Krishnarjun Peethambaram (son), filed a petition under Section 482 CrPC (read with Section 5...