Search Results for "buyer's default"

211 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 211 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Bank's Illegal Dispossession of Auction Purchaser. Petitioner Purchased Flat in 2017 Auction by SBI, but Was Forcibly Evicted by Saraswat Bank in 2025 Without Due Process.

The petitioners, Mariyam Rangwala and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court at Bo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes FIR Against Witness in Land Dispute Case — No Prima Facie Case for Criminal Breach of Trust or Cheating. Witness's Role Limited to Signing Sale Deed Does Not Attract Criminal Liability Under Sections 406, 420, 423, 120-B IPC.

The present application was filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) for quashing of FIR being C.R. No.1-576 of 2007 reg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Liquidator's Appeal, Upholds Forfeiture of EMD and PDM for Default by Successful Bidder in Liquidation Sale. Writ Petitioner's Failure to Pay Balance Sale Consideration Within Stipulated Time Justified Forfeiture Under IBC Regulations.

The appellant, Sri Pankaj Srivastava, Liquidator of M/s Samrudhi Realty Ltd., appealed against an order dated 12.12.2024 passed by a learned Single Ju...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Striking Out of Defence in Suit for Specific Performance. Defence of Defendant No.2 Restored as Trial Court's Discretion to Strike Out Defence Under Order 39 Rule 2A CPC Requires Willful Disobedience of Injunction Order.

The Petitioner, Sanjay Thakkar, was Defendant No.2 in Special Civil Suit No.144 of 2016 filed by Respondent No.1, Bhojja Shantu Shetty, for enforcemen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partly Allows Manufacturer's Appeal in Airbag Non-Deployment Case. Non-Disclosure of Airbag Deployment Threshold Constitutes Unfair Trade Practice Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The appeal arose from a consumer complaint filed by Shailendra Bhatnagar against Hyundai Motor India Limited regarding non-deployment of airbags in hi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Consumer Commission Order Directing Builder to Refund Amount with Interest in Flat Possession Delay Case. Builder's Appeal Dismissed as Subsequent Purchaser Entitled to Interest from Deposit Dates Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Despite Force Majeure Claims.

The dispute arose from a consumer complaint filed by the purchaser against the builder for delayed possession of a residential flat. The original allo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Finds Reliance Companies Guilty of Contempt for Breach of Undertakings to Pay INR 550 Crore to Ericsson India Pvt. Ltd. The court held that the undertakings making payment conditional upon sale of assets were contrary to the court's order and constituted wilful disobedience.

The Supreme Court of India dealt with three contempt petitions filed by Ericsson India Pvt. Ltd. against Reliance Communications Ltd., Reliance Teleco...