KAHC010159832015_1
15 Dec 2017...
Search Results for "basic requirements"
2149 result(s) found
Found 2149 result(s)
Supreme Court
"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."
5 Nov 2024The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...
- 765
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses Petitions Challenging Cancellation of Tender by Western Coalfields Limited. Tender cancellation upheld as employer has discretion to cancel tender before issuance of purchase order, and no concluded contract exists.
5 Jan 2023The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by successful bidders challenging the cancellation of a global tender issued by Western Coalfields Limi...
- 85
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Maintainability of Individual Workmen's Complaints for Permanency Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971. Industrial Court Dismissed Complaints Holding Recognised Union Had Exclusive Right to File Such Complaints, and High Court Finds Need for Factual Adjudication on Merits.
29 Jul 2005The writ petitions arose from a common judgment of the Industrial Court, Pune, dated 13-3-1996, which dismissed 63 workmen's complaints seeking perman...
- 16
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Examines Constitutionality of Prohibitory Orders Under Section 144 CrPC Restricting Public Assembly. Judgment Clarifies That Reasonable Restrictions on Speech and Assembly Must Be Just, Fair and Reasonable Under Articles 19 and 21.
1 Aug 2026The Supreme Court initiated a suo motu criminal writ petition regarding the incident at Ramlila Maidan on 4-5 June 2011, involving the imposition of p...
- 52
High Court
Bombay High Court Holds Entire Rule 15 of MEPS Rules Applies to Probationary Employees Under Section 5(3) of MEPS Act — Non-Compliance of Sub-Rules (3) and (5) Does Not Ipso Facto Vitiate Termination if Sub-Rule (6) Is Satisfied. The court clarified that only sub-rule (6) of Rule 15 is relevant for termination during probation, and failure to comply with sub-rules (3) and (5) does not automatically invalidate termination if the Management has objectively assessed the employee's performance.
30 May 2023This judgment arises from a reference made by a learned Single Judge to a Larger Bench of the Bombay High Court at Nagpur, concerning the interpretati...
- 49
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Membership Grant to Flat Purchaser in Cooperative Housing Society. Section 23(2) of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 mandates admission of purchaser as member upon transfer of share and interest in property.
26 Jul 2019The petitioner, Punam Cooperative Housing Society Ltd., challenged an order dated 31.3.2019 passed by the Divisional Joint Registrar, Cooperative Soci...
- 232
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Interprets Scope of 'Child' under POCSO Act in Appeal Concerning Mentally Challenged Victim. Mental Age of Adult with Cerebral Palsy Considered for Applicability of Special Procedures under Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012.
1 Aug 2026The case concerned a criminal appeal by the prosecutrix, a 38-year-old woman suffering from cerebral palsy (R. Hemiparesis), through her mother. An FI...
- 81
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses State's Appeal in Gujarat Sales Tax Act Case Due to No Breach of Exemption Conditions and Application of Promissory Estoppel. The assessee was entitled to exemption under Entry No.255(2) of Notification dated 05.03.1992 as raw materials were used in the eligible unit, and subsequent amendments did not retroactively impose liabilities, upholding the principle of promissory estoppel under Section 49(2) of the Gujarat Sales Tax Act, 1969.
21 Jan 2022The dispute arose from the State of Gujarat's appeal against the High Court's dismissal of its tax appeals, which upheld the Gujarat Value Added Tax T...
- 265
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Writ Petition Challenging Revision Order — Revisional Court Erred in Entertaining Revision Under Section 438 BNSS Against Order Under Section 164 BNSS Without Notice. Order Under Section 164 BNSS Is Summary and Not Subject to Revision; Natural Justice Violated.
15 Jun 2026The petitioner, Shri Noberto Paulo Sebastiao Fernandes, through his constituted attorney, filed a criminal writ petition before the High Court of Bomb...
- 94
