W.P.NOS.16428 OF 2025, 25868 OF 2024, 25869 OF 2024,
9 Jul 2026...
Search Results for "autonomous functioning"
131 result(s) found
Found 131 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Challenging Sanction and Cognizance in UAPA Case — No Infirmity Found in Sanction Order or Cognizance Proceedings. The Court upheld the validity of the NIA's takeover of investigation and the sanction order under Section 45(2) UAPA, finding that the timeline for independent review is directory and the cognizance order was based on prima facie material.
20 Sep 2024The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Fuleshwar Gope challenging the judgment of the Jharkhand High Court which refused to quash the sanctio...
- 668
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Challenging Sanction and Cognizance in UAPA Case — No Infirmity Found in Sanction Order or Cognizance Order. Court upholds validity of suo-motu sanction under Section 45(2) of UAPA and cognizance order under Section 120B IPC read with UAPA and CLA Act.
20 Sep 2024The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Fuleshwar Gope challenging the judgment of the Jharkhand High Court which refused to quash the sanctio...
- 815
Supreme Court
"Supreme Court of India Resolves Complexities in Taxation of Mineral Rights" "Judgment Clarifies Legislative Powers and the Nature of Royalty in Mining Sector"
25 Jul 2024The Supreme Court of India addressed a significant dispute regarding the distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the States, specific...
- 484
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision by Goa Pollution Control Board Against Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application. Civil Court jurisdiction not barred under Air and Water Acts for injunction against statutory authority when plaint discloses cause of action.
9 Feb 2023The case involves a Civil Revision Application filed by the Goa Pollution Control Board (Applicant/Defendant No.6) against an order of the District Ju...
- 54
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Reassessment Notice Against Souharda Cooperative Societies — Cooperative Societies Registered Under State Act Are Not 'Co-operative Banks' Under Income Tax Act. The court held that Souharda Cooperative Societies, not having an RBI license, are not co-operative banks under Section 2(19) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and are entitled to deduction under Section 80P.
16 Jan 2020The judgment involves two writ petitions filed by Souharda Cooperative Societies registered under the Karnataka Souharda Sahakari Act, 1997. The first...
- 162
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Bar Council Resolution Recognizing Rival Advocates Association — Unregistered Association Cannot Be Recognized Over Registered One. Resolution BCM Res. No.52/10 dated 12-13/06/2010 quashed as arbitrary and illegal.
20 Sep 2019The petitioner, Advocates' Association, Nelamangala, a registered society under the Karnataka Societies Registration Act, filed a writ petition under ...
- 54
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Removal of Bank Officer in State Bank of India Disciplinary Case. Penalty of Removal from Service under Rule 67(i) of State Bank of India Officers Service Rules Upheld as Not Disproportionate to Charges of Irregularities as Branch Manager.
20 Dec 2016The petitioner, Gopal Vajani, was employed by the State Bank of India (the Bank) since 1978, rising from Clerk-cum-typist to Scale-III officer. He was...
- 75
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Section 64 of Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994 Barring Legal Practitioners from Appearing Before College Tribunal. Section 64 is Not Repugnant to Advocates Act, 1961 as Section 30 Thereof is Not in Force and Tribunal is Not a Court.
15 Mar 2012The judgment concerns two writ petitions challenging Section 64 of the Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994, which bars legal practitioners from appeari...
- 98
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Seeking Regularisation of Temporary Employees in MSEDCL — Project-Based Workers Not Entitled to Regularisation. Temporary employees engaged for electrification of tribal hamlets under Maharashtra State Electricity Board held not entitled to regularisation as their employment was co-terminus with the project and not against sanctioned posts.
30 Nov -0001The petitioners, a group of temporary employees, were engaged as electricians and wiremen by the Maharashtra State Electricity Board (MSEB) for a spec...
- 87
